Sunitinib Potential New Option for Adjuvant Treatment in RCC

Article

Patients with renal cell carcinoma at high risk for recurrence had prolonged disease-free survival when treated with sunitinib compared with placebo.

Patients with renal cell carcinoma at high risk for recurrence had prolonged disease-free survival when treated with sunitinib compared with placebo, according to the results of a phase III trial (abstract LBA11_PR) presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2016 Congress, held October 7–11 in Copenhagen, Denmark.

“Sunitinib is a potential new option for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma, given the increase in disease-free survival and the manageable safety profile,” said lead author Alain Ravaud, MD, PhD, head of medical oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, France, in a press release. “The results of this trial could change practice because there is currently no standard treatment in this setting.”

The trial included 615 patients with previously untreated locoregional renal cell carcinoma. All patients had undergone nephrectomy and were randomly assigned to 50 mg/d sunitinib or placebo in a 4 weeks on 2 weeks off schedule for 1 year. One dose reduction to 37.5 mg per day was allowed in the protocol. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival assessed by central review.

At follow-up, fewer disease-free events occurred in the sunitinib arm compared with placebo (113 vs 144). Sunitinib significantly prolonged disease-free survival by central review compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.761; P = .030). The median disease-free survival was 6.8 years for sunitinib compared with 5.6 years for placebo. Similar prolongation of disease-free survival was seen in higher-risk patients as well (HR, 0.737; P = .044).

Patients assigned to sunitinib experienced more grade 3 or worse adverse events (62.1%) compared with placebo (21.1%); however, the rate of serious adverse events was similar between the two arms and no deaths occurred due to treatment toxicity.

“We hope sunitinib will be approved by regulators for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Clinicians should then use the drug according to the trial,” Ravaud said. “This is particularly important since sunitinib was not beneficial in another trial using a different methodology.”

Patients who showed benefit had clear cell renal cell carcinoma, no metastases, and were at high risk of recurrence.

“Disease-free survival is a useful surrogate endpoint, but the results from different studies have been contradictory. It does not necessarily translate to overall survival, which is the gold standard,” said Thomas Powles, MBBS, MD, professor of urology cancer at the Barts Cancer Institute, London, commenting on the study. “Without a consistently positive disease-free survival signal it would be premature for me to recommend sunitinib as adjuvant therapy for my patients, particularly when one considers the toxicity.”

Recent Videos
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and high-risk features may derive benefit from ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.