Susan F. Slovin, MD, PhD, Reviews Future Landscape of Systemic Therapies for Prostate Cancer

Video

Susan F. Slovin, MD, PhD, spoke about how new approaches can support clinical practice guidelines and physician intuition in treating patients with prostate cancer.

At the15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, CancerNetwork® spoke with Susan F. Slovin, MD, PhD, associate vice chair of Academic Administration in the Department of Medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, about upcoming treatments in the prostate cancer space.

She mentioned the phase 3 VISION trial (NCT03511664), which showed that 177Lu-PSMA-617 helped prolong imaging-based progression-free survival for patients with advanced prostate-specific membrane antigen–positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Transcript:

Right now, I would say that the radioligands and the theranostics are now appearing to have the greatest impact, because of the data that came out recently from the VISION trial. It may not be appropriate for everyone, but it seems to [result in] improvement. We have many new drugs that are out there, including the PARP inhibitors and novel combinations of different classes of drugs that may improve quality of life and radiographic progression-free survival. I think the hardest thing that we have to face right now is what is the best first-line or second-line [treatment]? And there’s no answer. I think it’s going to depend on the performance status of the patient, the extent of the disease, what the drug interactions could potentially be, and what your experience is.

I know we all follow NCCN [National Comprehensive Cancer Network] guidelines, but they are guidelines. One has to have a certain level of intuition about how this patient may or may not respond to the treatment. I would say the big areas, are theranostics and genomics, probably the fact that many of the drugs that are out there, like PARP inhibitors for example, are being used in novel combinations. I would certainly not forget immunotherapy even though it is not giving a wallop to the same degree that we’re seeing. It’s a very labor-intensive approach. I think that at some point, it’s going to prove positive in our patients. It’s just a matter of patience.

Reference

Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091-1103. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2107322

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content