Tamoxifen Plus Extended Letrozole Treatment Yields Improvement in Disease-Free Survival for Postmenopausal HR+ Breast Cancer

Article

Patients who were given extended 5-year treatment with letrozole plus 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen experienced an improvement in disease-free survival compared with 2 to 3 years of treatment with letrozole.

Patients who received extended treatment with letrozole for 5 years following 2 to 3 years of treatment with tamoxifen (Nolvadex) experienced an improved disease-free survival (DFS) over 2 to 3 years of letrozole for patients with postmenopausal hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, according to findings from the phase 3 LEAD study (NCT01064635) that were published in The Lancet Oncology.

After a median follow-up of 11.7 years, investigators reported a DFS rate of 25.4% among patients in the control group, and 20.7% in the extended group. The 12-year DFS was 62% (95% CI, 57%-66%) in the control group compared with 67% (95% CI, 62%-71%) in the extended treatment group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .0064).

A total of 2056 patients were enrolled on the study and randomized to receive 2.5 mg of letrozole for either 2 to 3 years (n = 1030), or 5 years (n = 1026) plus tamoxifen. The median patient age was 61 years, and 12.2% of patients who were HER2-positive received treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin).

Letrozole was discontinued in 19.5% of patients in the control group and 37.1% in the extended group. In the first 2 to 3 years of randomization, 23.0% discontinued letrozole and 14.0% discontinued in the following years. Reasons for discontinuation in both the control and extended treatment cohorts, respectively, included adverse effects (AEs; 8.9 vs 14.4%) and refusal of treatment (3.8% vs 10.4%).

During the study, 12.8% of patients died, including 147 patients in the control group, and 116 in the extended treatment group. The 12-year overall survival in the control group was 84% (95% CI, 82%-87%) compared with 88% (95% CI, 86%-90%) in the extended group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98; P = .036).

A post-hoc landmark analysis was conducted that included 1890 patients, excluding patients with a disease-free survival event or those lost to follow-up. The 10-year disease-free survival after treatment divergence was 59% (95% CI, 53%-64%) in the control group and 68% (95% CI, 63%-72%) in the extended group (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P = .0022).

The most common AEs that led to discontinuation in both the control group and extended treatment group, respectively, were arthralgia (4.3% vs 7.7%) and myalgia (<1% vs <1%). Patients had a median duration of treatment with letrozole of 2.4 years in the control group and 5.0 years in the extended group.

In terms of safety, the most common grade 3/4 AEs in the control and extended treatment cohorts, respectively, were arthralgia (2.2% vs 3.0%) and myalgia (0.7% vs 0.9%). Other AEs included osteoporosis (4.7% vs 8.3%), hypercholesterolemia (3.1% vs 2.0%; P = .17), and cardiovascular events (0.1% vs 0.6%; P = .069).

Additionally, 0.3% of patients in the control group experienced treatment-related serious AEs such as atrial fibrillation, bone pain, and vomiting, compared with 0.8% in the extended treatment group who experienced pneumonia, macular degeneration, thromboembolic, and cardiovascular events. No deaths occurred as a result of toxic effects.

Reference

Del Mastro L, Mansutti M, Bisagni G, et al. Extended therapy with letrozole as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(10):1458-1467. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00352-1

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content