Teclistamab Induces Durable Responses in Phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 Trial in R/R Multiple Myeloma

Article

Results from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial highlighted sustained responses when teclistamab was used to treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who are triple refractory.

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who are triple refractory experienced long-lasting responses when treated with teclistamab, according to data from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181; NCT04557098) published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The overall response rate (ORR) was 63.0% (95% CI, 55.2%-70.4%) and 39.4% of patients had a complete response (CR) or better. Patients had a median time to first response of 1.2 months, and the median time to best response was 3.8 months. The minimal residual disease–negativity rate for those who had a CR or better was 46%. The median follow-up was 14.1 months. Moreover, median duration of response was 18.4 months (95% CI, 14.9-not estimable), and median progression-free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-17.1).

A total of 165 patients enrolled and received 1.5 mg/kg of teclistamab. Overall, 42.4% of patients were continuing with treatment as of March 2022; patients had a median treatment duration of 8.5 months. Teclistamab treatment was given to 59.4% of patients for a minimum of 6 months and 47.9% were treated for at least 9 months. Patient characteristics were similar between the phase 1 and 2 studies.

Adverse effects (AEs) occurred in all patients, with 94.5% having grade 3/4 toxicities. During cycle 21, 1 patient had a dose reduction because of neutropenia, and 63.0% of patients skipped a dose of treatment due to toxicities. Discontinuation of teclistamab occurred in 2 patients because of AEs. The most common AEs were neutropenia (70.9%), anemia (52.1%), and thrombocytopenia (40.0%). Of those with neutropenia (n = 117), 91 patients were treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy.

Infections occurred in 76.4% of patients, 44.8% of which were grade 3 or 4. A total of 123 patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia, 65 of whom received intravenous immunoglobulin. Injection-site reactions were reported in 36.4% of patients, all of which were low grade.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 72.1% of patients, with 3.6% having CRS during cycle 2 or later. The majority of CRS events were grade 1 or 2 and fully resolved with the exception of 1 grade 3 event that occurred in a patient with concurrent pneumonia; the event resolved within 2 days. The median onset to CRS was 2 days with a duration of 2 days. Supportive measures for CRS were given in 66.7% of patients and included tocilizumab (Actemra) treatment in 36.4%, low-flow oxygen in 12.7%, and glucocorticoids in 8.5%.

Neurotoxic effects were reported in 24 patients, most of which were low-grade grade with the exception of 1 grade 4 seizure in a patient with bacterial meningitis during cycle 7. Headache was described as the most frequent neurotoxicity and was related to teclistamab in 8.5% of patients. Nine events of immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity occurred with 7 being concurrent with CRS; all events resolved without discontinuation or dose reduction. Within these patients, 4 received supportive treatment, such as tocilizumab (n = 3), dexamethasone (n = 3), levetiracetam (n = 2), and gabapentin (n = 1).

Reference

Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203478

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content