Timothy A. Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, on COVID-19 Vaccination for Patients in Phase 1 Cancer Trials

Video

The medical oncologist and physician scientist based at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center explained recommendations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients participating in phase 1 oncology clinical trials.

In an article published in the Lancet Oncology, investigators propose guidelines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients participating in phase 1 oncology clinical trials.

Overall, the investigators indicated that even though there are risks in vaccinating this patient population, the potential benefit to patients should be judiciously balanced with the unknown effects. Thus, it is essential for providers to make decisions regarding vaccination on an individual basis with patients and their advocates.

“This is an opportunity for, and indeed a duty of, treating oncologists, trial sponsors, and regulatory agencies to monitor, document, and communicate outcomes of the different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines during anticancer drug administration, as well as their effect on the development of [coronavirus disease 2019], toxicity of anticancer drugs, and eventual cancer outcomes,” wrote the authors who were led Timothy A. Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Yap, a medical oncologist and physician-scientist based at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discussed these recommendations and what is important for both patients and providers to understand about vaccination.

Reference:

Yap TA, Siu LL, Calvo E, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and phase 1 cancer clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. Published online February 8, 2021. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00017-6

Recent Videos
According to Megan Mullins, PhD, MPH, challenging cultural norms surrounding death and dying may reduce the receipt of low-value end-of-life cancer care.
Earlier and more frequent talks about disabling ICDs with patients receiving end-of-life care and their families may help avoid excessive pain.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
AI-powered tools may help alleviate doctor burnout and give clinicians more time to directly engage with patients.
Artificial intelligence may have the potential to enrich pathology practices to help identify aspects of tumor biology not seen with the human eye.
Efficacy results from the MASAI trial preceded the creation of the UK-funded EDITH trial, assessing 5 AI platforms in 700,000 women undergoing mammography.
In considering patients’ busy lives, AI may help reduce the number of visits required to fully stage and grade cancers.
Related Content