Clinical TopicsGlobal BulletinAll NewsApproval Alert
2 Minute DrillAround the PracticeBetween the LinesBreaking BarriersFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsMorning RoundsOncViewPodcastsReadout 360Sponsored MediaTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology Brothers
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Contemporary ConceptsAwareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsored
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Biomarkers
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
Hormone-related Cancers
Immunotherapy
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
LymphomaLymphoma
Melanoma
Mesothelioma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Around the Practice
  • Between the Lines
  • Contemporary Concepts
  • Journal
  • OncView
  • Podcasts
  • Readout 360
  • Insights from Experts at Mayo Clinic on Translating Evidence to Clinical Practice
  • Optimizing Outcomes in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
Adverse Effects
Biomarkers
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
Hormone-related Cancers
Immunotherapy
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
LymphomaLymphoma
Melanoma
Mesothelioma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Treatment-Related Regret Varys by Approach in Prostate Cancer

March 25, 2022
By Ariana Pelosci
Article

Patients with prostate cancer who received surgery had the highest rate of treatment-related regret followed by radiotherapy and active surveillance.

Treatment-related regret was reported in 1 in 10 patients with localized prostate cancer, with rates of regret being dependent on the approach, according to results from a cohort study published in JAMA Oncology.

Five years following diagnosis, treatment-related regret was most common in patients who underwent surgery (16%) followed by radiotherapy (11%) and active surveillance (7%). Patients receiving active treatment vs active surveillance had an increase of regret among those underwent surgery (adjusted OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.44-4.01) and not radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.88-2.66). In particular, change in sexual function from baseline was significantly associated with regret, although similar associations were not identified with regard to other patient-reported functional outcomes, (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81).

A total of 3277 patients from the prospective, population-based comparative effectiveness analysis of surgery and radiation (CEASAR) cohort were included, of whom 2072 were included in the analysis. Within this cohort, 1136 men had surgery, 667 had radiotherapy, and 269 had active surveillance. At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 64 years.

At 5 years, 13% (95% CI, 12%-15%) of patients said they had treatment regret. This was commonly seen among 71% of patients (95% CI, 55%-87%) who subjectively judged treatment effectiveness and 48% of patients (95% CI, 41%-55%) who thought treatment adverse effects were worse than expected.

Compared with active survellience, patients with low-risk disease who underwent surgery were more likely to regret their decision (adjusted OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.45-5.14), although the same could not be said for those receiving radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.90-3.68). The same was found for the intermediate-risk population for both surgery (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.85-6.05) and radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.56-4.32). Finally, those with high-risk disease had a nonsignificant lower likelihood of regret when receiving surgery (adjusted OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.09-2.99) or radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-1.27). However, statistical significance was only confirmed in the low-risk group who underwent surgery (P = .002).

As treatment-related regret was likely altered via functional outcomes, the analysis was repeated with the inclusion of longitudinal change in patient-reported functional outcomes, treatment-related health problems, and patients’ perceptions of treatment efficacy. Patients low-risk disease on active treatment continued to have the highest likelihood of regret among those undergoing surgery (adjusted OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.05-4.13) but not radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.79-3.62). Similar findings were reported in the intermediate-risk group for both surgery (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.51-4.43) and radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.47-4.35). Additionally, patients with high-risk disease who underwent radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92) and surgery (adjusted OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04-1.81) had a lower likelihood of regret.

Compared with other examined variables such as expectations, patient perspective of treatment effectiveness (adjusted OR, 5.40; 95% CI, 2.51-13.56) and treatment adverse effects (adjusted OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 3.97-8.58) were more notably associated with regret.

With regard to characteristics that were evaluated at baseline including participatory decision-making tool (PDM-7) scores (adjusted OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92), social support (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90), and age (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97) were independently inversely correlated with regret.

Investigators found that social support and age at diagnosis were no longer significantly associated with developing regret, although higher education status was protective (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93).

Reference

Wallis CJD, Zhao Z, Huang LC, et al. Association of treatment modality, functional outcomes, and baseline characteristics with treatment-related regret among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(1):50-59. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5160

Recent Videos
1 expert in this video
1 expert in this video
1 expert in this video
Multidisciplinary collaboration may help in minimizing the treatment burden among patients with prostate cancer, according to Curtiland Deville Jr., MD.
4 experts in this video
4 experts in this video
Focused, high-dose radiotherapy doses may prolong survival and the interval to subsequent therapy for patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Data show increasing use of proton therapy overall but widening gaps in populations who have access to this treatment, says Curtiland Deville Jr., MD.
Related Content
Advertisement

Pembrolizumab/Docetaxel Does Not Improve OS/rPFS Outcomes in mCRPC

Pembrolizumab/Docetaxel Does Not Improve OS/rPFS Outcomes in mCRPC

Tim Cortese
April 15th 2025
Article

Results from the KEYNOTE-921 trial demonstrated that pembrolizumab with docetaxel did not elicit efficacy improvements vs placebo with docetaxel in prostate cancer.


Navigating Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Navigating Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD;David Morris, MD, MS;Tanya B. Dorff, MD;Mark T. Fleming, MD
March 5th 2025
Podcast

A patient case of a 50-year-old man with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer sparked a debate among oncologists regarding the best course of action.


Results from PSMAfore show that lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan elicited a median rPFS of 9.3 months vs 5.6 months with ARPI in prostate cancer.

FDA Approves Radioligand Therapy in PSMA–Positive, Castration-Resistant PC

Tim Cortese
March 28th 2025
Article

Results from PSMAfore show that lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan elicited a median rPFS of 9.3 months vs 5.6 months with ARPI in prostate cancer.


AI tools may show utility in areas such as prostate diagnostic imaging, pathology, and treatment outcome predictions.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Evolutions in Prostate Cancer Care

James B. Yu, MD, MHS, FASTRO;Julian C. Hong, MD, MS
July 1st 2024
Podcast

AI tools may show utility in areas such as prostate diagnostic imaging, pathology, and treatment outcome predictions.


The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.

NeuroSAFE Improves Erectile Function, Urinary Continence in Prostate Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
March 24th 2025
Article

The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.


FDA Approves PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer

FDA Approves PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer

Ariana Pelosci
March 21st 2025
Article

The new drug application for TLX007-CDx has been approved by the FDA for patients with prostate cancer.

Related Content
Advertisement

Pembrolizumab/Docetaxel Does Not Improve OS/rPFS Outcomes in mCRPC

Pembrolizumab/Docetaxel Does Not Improve OS/rPFS Outcomes in mCRPC

Tim Cortese
April 15th 2025
Article

Results from the KEYNOTE-921 trial demonstrated that pembrolizumab with docetaxel did not elicit efficacy improvements vs placebo with docetaxel in prostate cancer.


Navigating Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Navigating Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD;David Morris, MD, MS;Tanya B. Dorff, MD;Mark T. Fleming, MD
March 5th 2025
Podcast

A patient case of a 50-year-old man with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer sparked a debate among oncologists regarding the best course of action.


Results from PSMAfore show that lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan elicited a median rPFS of 9.3 months vs 5.6 months with ARPI in prostate cancer.

FDA Approves Radioligand Therapy in PSMA–Positive, Castration-Resistant PC

Tim Cortese
March 28th 2025
Article

Results from PSMAfore show that lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan elicited a median rPFS of 9.3 months vs 5.6 months with ARPI in prostate cancer.


AI tools may show utility in areas such as prostate diagnostic imaging, pathology, and treatment outcome predictions.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Evolutions in Prostate Cancer Care

James B. Yu, MD, MHS, FASTRO;Julian C. Hong, MD, MS
July 1st 2024
Podcast

AI tools may show utility in areas such as prostate diagnostic imaging, pathology, and treatment outcome predictions.


The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.

NeuroSAFE Improves Erectile Function, Urinary Continence in Prostate Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
March 24th 2025
Article

The adverse effect profile was similar among patients with prostate cancer using NeuroSAFE-assisted RARP vs standard RARP.


FDA Approves PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer

FDA Approves PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer

Ariana Pelosci
March 21st 2025
Article

The new drug application for TLX007-CDx has been approved by the FDA for patients with prostate cancer.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.