Twice-Daily Chemoradiotherapy Boosts Survival in Limited-Stage SCLC

Commentary
Video

Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy appeared to confer less leukocyte and lymphocyte depletion compared with once-daily radiation in LS-SCLC.

Bin Gui, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® about key efficacy and safety findings from a meta-analysis of prospective trials assessing twice-daily and once-daily chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). He and colleagues presented results from this analysis in a poster session at the 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting.

Across 8 trials including approximately 3000 patients, Gui, resident physician in the Department of Radiation Medicine at Northwell Health Cancer Institute, noted that survival improved with a twice-daily radiotherapy schedule, even when combining CRT with immunotherapy. Furthermore, there appeared to be no differences in high-grade toxicities of interest when comparing the twice-daily and once-daily regimens.

Data from the poster revealed a 13% improvement in 2-year overall survival (OS) with twice-daily CRT vs a once-daily regimen (risk ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21). Additionally, in 3 trials evaluating immunotherapy plus CRT, the 2-year OS rate improved by 25% with the twice-daily schedule (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.39).

Additional data highlighted that significantly less leukocyte depletion (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94) and lymphocyte depletion (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78) occurred with twice-daily CRT vs once-daily treatment. Across all evaluable studies, investigators observed no differences in grade 3 or higher esophagitis or pneumonitis with the use of twice-daily or once-daily CRT. Looking ahead, Gui and coauthors noted a need for head-to-head randomized trials comparing once-daily and twice-daily CRT with consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors to validate these findings.

Transcript:

Eight trials comprising nearly 3000 patients were included for this meta-analysis. We found that twice-daily radiotherapy significantly improved 2-year OS by 13% compared with the once-daily regimen. More importantly, in the subgroup analysis of 3 trials incorporating immunotherapy, 2-year OS was 25% higher with twice-daily radiotherapy.

Across all trials, there were no differences in grade 3 or higher esophagitis or pneumonitis. Also, in the 2 trials that reported lymphocyte counts, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy was associated with significantly less leukocyte depletion and lymphocyte depletion.

Reference

Gui B, Akerman M, Sekari J, Plann-Curley B, Parashar B. Should we return to old school in a new era? a meta-analysis of twice daily vs. once daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Presented at: 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 27-October 1, 2025; San Francisco, CA.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Related Content