Twice-Daily Chemoradiotherapy Boosts Survival in Limited-Stage SCLC

Commentary
Video

Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy appeared to confer less leukocyte and lymphocyte depletion compared with once-daily radiation in LS-SCLC.

Bin Gui, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® about key efficacy and safety findings from a meta-analysis of prospective trials assessing twice-daily and once-daily chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). He and colleagues presented results from this analysis in a poster session at the 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting.

Across 8 trials including approximately 3000 patients, Gui, resident physician in the Department of Radiation Medicine at Northwell Health Cancer Institute, noted that survival improved with a twice-daily radiotherapy schedule, even when combining CRT with immunotherapy. Furthermore, there appeared to be no differences in high-grade toxicities of interest when comparing the twice-daily and once-daily regimens.

Data from the poster revealed a 13% improvement in 2-year overall survival (OS) with twice-daily CRT vs a once-daily regimen (risk ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21). Additionally, in 3 trials evaluating immunotherapy plus CRT, the 2-year OS rate improved by 25% with the twice-daily schedule (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.39).

Additional data highlighted that significantly less leukocyte depletion (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94) and lymphocyte depletion (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78) occurred with twice-daily CRT vs once-daily treatment. Across all evaluable studies, investigators observed no differences in grade 3 or higher esophagitis or pneumonitis with the use of twice-daily or once-daily CRT. Looking ahead, Gui and coauthors noted a need for head-to-head randomized trials comparing once-daily and twice-daily CRT with consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitors to validate these findings.

Transcript:

Eight trials comprising nearly 3000 patients were included for this meta-analysis. We found that twice-daily radiotherapy significantly improved 2-year OS by 13% compared with the once-daily regimen. More importantly, in the subgroup analysis of 3 trials incorporating immunotherapy, 2-year OS was 25% higher with twice-daily radiotherapy.

Across all trials, there were no differences in grade 3 or higher esophagitis or pneumonitis. Also, in the 2 trials that reported lymphocyte counts, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy was associated with significantly less leukocyte depletion and lymphocyte depletion.

Reference

Gui B, Akerman M, Sekari J, Plann-Curley B, Parashar B. Should we return to old school in a new era? a meta-analysis of twice daily vs. once daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Presented at: 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting; September 27-October 1, 2025; San Francisco, CA.

Recent Videos
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
A new partnership agreement involving AI use may help spread radiotherapeutic standards from academic centers to more patients in community-based practices.
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Recent findings presented at ASTRO 2025 suggest an “exciting opportunity” to expand the role of radiation oncology in different non-malignant indications.
The 3 most likely directions of radiotherapy advancements come from new technology, combinations with immunotherapy, and the incorporation of particle therapy.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Related Content