Cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely accepted as neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; UFT is also an active agent against this disease. In the first retrospective study, we examined the efficacy of UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with maxillary cancer.
ABSTRACT: Cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely accepted as neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; UFT is also an active agent against this disease. In the first retrospective study, we examined the efficacy of UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with maxillary cancer. The 5-year survival rate of those treated with UFT vs those not treated was 71.4% vs 23.8%, respectively. In the second study we developed the carboplatin plus UFT regimen-as a modification of cisplatin plus 5-FU -and studied its efficacy and toxicity in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. These patients received UFT plus carboplatin. The objective response rate was 53.1%; grade ³ 3 leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were rare. These findings suggest that UFT plus carboplatin in the outpatient setting is feasible for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [ONCOLOGY 14(Suppl 9):72-75, 2000]
UFT (uracil and tegafur), an active agent against advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), is widely used in Japan.[1] Its efficacy for adjuvant chemotherapy has been proved in randomized studies.[2] In the first of two retrospective studies, we examined the efficacy of UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with maxillary cancer. The next study developed the UFT and carboplatin (Paraplatin) regimen as a modification of cisplatin (Platinol) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) to determine its activity and evaluate toxicity in advanced HNSCC patients.[3]
This study included 48 patients with maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma who proved disease-free after definitive treatment with surgery or chemoradiotherapy. UFT (200 mg/m²/day) was continuously administered for more than 1 year. In all, 15 patients were successfully administered UFT; nine patients did not complete the schedule due to toxicity, and 24 did not receive UFT (Table 1). Survival rates were retrospectively compared between patients treated with and without UFT.
Results
The 5-year survival rate in 39 evaluable patients was 41.5% in T3 patients and 20.2% in T4 patients (Figure 1). The 5-year survival rate in patients treated with UFT or without UFT was 76.6% and 22.6%, respectively. This indicates a significantly higher survival in the UFT patients (P = .001) (Figure 2). Comparison was made in 23 patients with or without UFT and five discontinued patients at T3. The 5-year survival rate was 71.4% in the UFT group, 23.8% in the group without UFT, and 40.0% in the UFT-discontinued group. These results indicate a favorable prognosis for the UFT group compared with the group without UFT (P = .033) and the UFT-discontinued group (P = .731) (Figure 3).
Patients with evaluable and unresectable HNSCC were enrolled in this study (Table 1). All the patients had normal bone marrow, renal, pulmonary functions and performance status of 0 or 1 (ECOG). UFT (400 mg/day) was administered from day 1 to day 14 and from day 28 to day 42. Carboplatin (350 mg/m²) was administered at day 7 and day 35.
Results
Two complete responses and 15 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 53.1% (95% confidence interval, 35.8% to 70.4%). The antitumor efficacy in terms of lesion site is shown in Table 2.
Toxicities greater than grade 3 were rare. Two patients experienced grade 3 leukopenia; one patient, grade 4 anemia; two patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There were no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal tract toxicities, fever, or stomatitis (Table 3).
Adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT achieved longer survival duration for patients with maxillary cancer compared with patients not receiving UFT. UFT plus carboplatin was proved to have efficacy for advanced HNSCC with mild toxicity. This regimen will be applied as adjuvant chemotherapy in the outpatient setting. To avoid grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity with this regimen, a dose-finding study for carboplatin is required.
1. Ota K, Taguchi T, Kimura K: Report on nationwide pooled data and cohort investigation in UFT phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 22:333-338, 1988.
2. Jacobs S, Makuch R: Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable head and neck cancer: A subset analysis of Head and Neck Contracts Program. J Clin Oncol 8:838-847, 1990.
3. Fujii M, Kanzaki J: Combination with carboplatin and UFT for head and neck cancer. Head and Neck Cancer 19:235-238, 1993.
4. Benasso M, Numico G, Merlano M: Carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck previously responding to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer 33:318-319, 1997.
Early Intervention, Regular Assessment Can Grasp Symptom Course for Head and Neck Cancer Therapy
April 28th 2024Nurses must increase the frequency of their assessments for early intervention of patients who undergo treatment for their head and neck cancer, in an effort to truly individualized care.
Prognostic Factors Linked With Poor Locoregional Control in Tongue Cancer
March 5th 2024Patients with factors such as lymphovascular space invasion or positive glossectomy specimen margins may be considered for adjuvant radiotherapy to optimize disease control of tongue squamous cell carcinoma.