Understanding and Managing Disease Heterogeneity in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Commentary
Video

In the SWOG S2409 PRISM trial, over 800 patients with small cell lung cancer will receive different treatment regimens based on their disease subtype.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork®, Anne Chiang, MD, PhD, discussed noteworthy research initiatives that have the potential to improve outcomes among patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). She specifically highlighted the methodology of the ongoing phase 2 SWOG S2409 PRISM trial (NCT06769126), which she serves as chair.

According to Chiang, an associate professor of medicine in the Section of Medical Oncology at Yale School of Medicine, the trial will include 800 patients with SCLC who will provide tumor tissue during the time of induction chemoimmunotherapy. Based on subsequent immunohistochemistry (IHC) results, patients will receive one of multiple immunotherapy-based regimens that encompass the use of different modalities such as PARP inhibitors and natural killer (NK) cell activators. This prospective trial, she described, may help in understanding disease heterogeneity in SCLC and tailoring specific treatment strategies to different patient subgroups.

Transcript:

The biology of [SCLC is something] we’re learning more about. One of the aspects is, just like the strategy in non–small cell [lung cancer], where we started to understand the heterogeneity, can we start to dial in our therapies for different subtypes? I’ll talk about a trial that is [from] a cooperative group: the SWOG S2409 PRISM trial that I happen to be the chair of. There’s a whole slew of people who have been involved, including my cochair Alberto Chiappori, MD, [from Moffitt Cancer Center], and Carl M. Gay, MD, PhD, and Lauren Averett Byers, MD, at MD Anderson [Cancer Center].

In the PRISM trial, we’re going to have over 800 patients where we ask for tissue during their frontline induction therapy with [chemoimmunotherapy]. Then, based on their subtype, are they A, N, P, or I? What is their SLFN11 status by IHC? Then those patients will be randomly [assigned] to the biomarker-directed therapy plus [immunotherapy] vs [immunotherapy-alone arm]. If you have a neuroendocrine subtype—A or N—and you are SLFN11 positive, you’ll get a PARP inhibitor plus [immunotherapy] vs [immunotherapy alone]. If you have subtype I, you’re going to get monalizumab, which is an NK cell activator, plus the [immunotherapy] vs [immunotherapy] alone, and so forth. We’re excited about that trial. It’s a prospective trial, and most of all, we’re going to be getting tissue from a slew of patients so that we can really move the field forward. [I am] very excited about that.

Recent Videos
For example, you have a belt of certain diseases or genetic disorders that you come across, such as sickle cell disease or thalassemia, that are more prevalent in these areas.
Recent findings presented at ASTRO 2025 suggest an “exciting opportunity” to expand the role of radiation oncology in different non-malignant indications.
The 3 most likely directions of radiotherapy advancements come from new technology, combinations with immunotherapy, and the incorporation of particle therapy.
Talent shortages in the manufacturing and administration of cellular therapies are problems that must be addressed at the level of each country.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Distance and training represent 2 major obstacles to making radiotherapy available to more patients with cancer across the world.
Point-of-care manufacturing, scalable manufacturing, and bringing the cost down [can help].
Louis Potters, MD, FASTRO, FABS, FACR, describes how evidence-based radiation protocols may integrate with novel artificial intelligence software.
The use of enhanced imaging and adaptive radiotherapy has lessened the burden on patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy as treatment.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Related Content