Undetected MRD Confers Improved PFS With Ibrutinib Combo in CLL/SLL

Commentary
Video

Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® at the 2024 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, Paolo Ghia, MD, PhD, discussed findings from the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study (NCT02910583) after 5.5 years of follow-up. Specifically, he described how undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) status improved progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) who received treatment with fixed-duration ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus venetoclax (Venclexta).

Ghia, a professor in medical oncology and director of the Strategic Research Program on CLL at Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Italy, explained how this study aimed to explore how lymph node sizes impacted efficacy outcomes with the ibrutinib combination. Regardless of whether patients had lymph nodes that exceeded or fell under 5 cm, however, undetectable MRD correlated with improvements in long-term PFS.

Investigators of the CAPTIVATE study concluded that long-term PFS was mostly related to undetectable MRD status, as responses per International Working Group on CLL criteria demonstrated a minor impact on outcomes, which was reported only in those with detectable MRD. Additionally, the safety of fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax was comparable regardless of lymph node bulkiness at baseline.

Transcript:

This year at ASH, we are presenting an update of the study with 5.5 years of follow-up, but that was not the point. The point is that we wanted to explore if and how bulky lymphadenopathy, defined as more than 5 cm of lymph node size, is affecting the response or the PFS in our patients. And what we have shown is that there is no difference in terms of long-term PFS in patients with less or more than 5 cm of the lymph node. In particular, the PFS was not different if the lymph node response was reducing the lymph node size below 1 cm or only below 2 cm.

What mattered, and this [was proved in] many other studies, was reaching undetected MRD. Even if you started with more than 5 cm of lymph node, even if you ended up with more than 2 cm of lymph node, if you had undetected MRD status, then your PFS was better than if you did not achieve undetected MRD. The value of undetected MRD was higher than the clinical response itself.

Reference

Wierda WG, Jacobs R, Barr PM, et al. Consistently high 5.5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients with and without bulky baseline lymphadenopathy ≥5 cm are associated with high undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD4) rates after first-line treatment with fixed-duration ibrutinib + venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study. Presented at the 2024 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition. December 7-10, 2024; San Diego, California. Abstract 1869.

Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Related Content