Twice-daily radiotherapy prolongs survival vs once-daily radiation among those with LS-SCLC, even with the incorporation of immunotherapy.
Bin Gui, MD
Northwell Health Cancer Institute
Administering chemoradiotherapy (CRT) twice daily improved survival and reduced toxicity vs once-daily treatment among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), according to Bin Gui, MD. However, it is necessary for additional research in the form of head-to-head randomized trials to validate the observed benefits of twice-daily radiotherapy.
At the 2025 American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Gui, resident physician in the Department of Radiation Medicine at Northwell Health Cancer Institute, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the findings and implications of a meta-analysis of prospective trials assessing twice-daily vs once-daily CRT among patients with LS-SCLC. Data from 8 trials including 2827 patients showed that a twice-daily schedule prolonged 2-year overall survival (OS) vs once-daily treatment by 13% (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21). Additionally, in 3 trials that evaluated immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy, twice-daily radiation improved 2-year OS by 25% (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.39).
Gui also reviewed strategies for incorporating dosimetry constraints, comprehensive supportive care, and other measures for sustaining quality of life among those undergoing thoracic radiotherapy. Furthermore, he described how less lymphocyte depletion reported with twice-daily CRT in the meta-analysis necessitated future work exploring the synergistic effect between radiation and immunotherapy.
“The addition of immunotherapy appears to favor twice-daily over once-daily [concurrent] CRT for LS-SCLC, with improved survival and reduced lymphocyte depletion,” Gui concluded.
The assessment of twice-daily vs. once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for LS-SCLC stemmed from a need to determine the optimal radiotherapy regimen as the standard of care with concurrent CRT continues to evolve. Earlier studies suggested twice-daily accelerated radiotherapy improved outcomes. However, its clinical adoption has been limited, particularly in North America, due to concerns about esophagitis and logistical challenges. More recently, the [phase 3] ADRIATIC trial [NCT03703297] demonstrated a significant benefit from adding consolidation immunotherapy following concurrent CRT, creating the need to understand how best to integrate this strategy with the concurrent CRT regimen, including the choice of radiotherapy fractionation schedule.2
Eight trials comprising nearly 3000 patients were included for this meta-analysis.We found that twice-daily radiotherapy significantly improved 2-year OS by 13% compared to the once-daily regimen. More importantly, in the subgroup analysis of 3 trials incorporating immunotherapy, 2-year OS was 25% higher with twice-daily radiotherapy.
Across all trials, there were no differences in grade 3 or higher esophagitis or pneumonitis. Also, in the 2 trials that reported lymphocyte counts, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy was associated with significantly less leukocyte depletion and lymphocyte depletion.
Best practices [for maintaining quality of life] involve radiation dosimetry constraints to prevent [adverse] effects, establishment of new evidence for combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy, patient education, symptom management of [adverse] effects, and comprehensive supportive care. In this study, accelerated radiotherapy with shorter treatment course appears to be safe with reduced hematologic adverse events.
Less lymphocyte depletion observed with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy warrants further investigation to optimize the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Head-to-head randomized trials comparing accelerated radiotherapy—either hyperfractionation or hypofractionation—and conventional fractionation CRT with consolidation immunotherapy are needed to validate these findings.