Walter Curran, MD, on Integration of Immunotherapy with Radiation Therapy

News
Article

Walter Curran, MD, detailed his presentation on immunotherapy and radiation therapy, and how integrating the 2 treatment options presents an exciting opportunity moving forward.

Walter Curran, MD, of the Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, discussed the opportunities with integration of immunotherapy with radiation therapy at the 17thAnnual Winter Lung Conference in Miami Beach, Florida.

Transcript:

There’s so many new advances in immuno-oncology now. We’ve now had several pathways forward to know how to best integrate it with radiation oncology. There’s really two areas I talked about today. One was for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer where those patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation now have an opportunity to receive immuno-oncology agents afterwards based on the pacific trial where survival benefit was demonstrated with the addition of durvalumab to that regimen. Now we’re really building on that platform and thinking of new ways to test this either to give additional immunotherapy during the chemo radiation, prior to or perhaps add another agent. So, I did summarize the ongoing trials in that space.

The second area I talked about is in the setting of using high-dose, highly focused stereotactic radiation, or SBRT, often for patients with earlier stage lung cancer.

So, we’ll see the value, and the final area I talked about is can SBRT or some other form of radiation actually induce a sufficient immune response to actually confer a benefit to patients receiving (immunotherapy) agents even in the metastatic setting. Is there the possibility that so called immunologically cold tumors can be made to be “hotter” by a radial therapy treatment of some type and therefore respond to immune agents better? I showed some interesting randomized phase II data addressing that and really find that to be an exciting opportunity moving forward.

Recent Videos
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Related Content