What is the Current State of ADC Treatment in EGFR-Amplified Glioblastoma?

Commentary
Video

Sonia Jain, PhD, stated that depatuxizumab mafodotin, ABBV-221, and ABBV-321 were 3 of the most prominent ADCs in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma.

EGFR amplification can be observed in half of the population of patients who have glioblastoma, according to Sonia Jain, PhD. For that reason, developing an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets EGFR is important, although current patient outcomes are not optimal.

During the 16th Annual World ADC Summit in San Diego, CA, Jain, a postdoctoral fellow and research associate at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, presented a seminar titled, “Assessing safety & [pharmacokinetic] profiles of ADCs against glioblastoma to understand reasons for observed toxicity & explore mitigation strategies”. Following the seminar, CancerNetwork® spoke with Jain about the state of ADCs in glioblastoma.

During the discussion, she also spoke about the current state of EGFR-directed ADCs, highlighting depatuxizumab mafodotin (ABT-414), ABBV-221, and ABBV-321 as notable examples. Depatuxizumab mafodotin was evaluated in the phase 3 Intellance1 trial (NCT02573324) in patients with newly diagnosed, EGFR-amplified glioblastoma. As Jain said, this trial did not meet significance for overall survival.

Ultimately, Jain concluded by posing a single question: “What can we improve in the future?”

Transcript:

In glioblastoma, half of the population has EGFR amplification. The ADC field—this work was started 5 to 7 years ago––at that time, an ADC developed by AbbVie was targeting EGFR, and there were no good indicators of how [pharmacokinetics] looked in mouse models. [The rationale] was to improve patient outcomes…which is not great as of now.

The 3 EGFR-targeting ADCs that I have tested have been in clinical trials. [Depatuxizumab mafodotin] has been the safest. [ABBV-221] and [ABBV-321] basically showed a bit of toxicity, and the trial was stopped in phase 1.

[Depatuxizumab mafodotin] performed well in the early clinical and pre-clinical phases, but it failed to provide overall survival in the phase 3 clinical trial. That’s why it is not in the market. It’s not benefiting patients. That’s where our work most relies upon: what can we improve in the future?

References

Jain S. Assessing safety & PK profiles of ADCs against glioblastoma to understand reasons for observed toxicity & explore mitigation strategies. Presented at the 2025 World Antibody Drug Conjugate Conference; San Diego, CA; November 3-6, 2025.

Recent Videos
Skin toxicities are common with targeted therapies for GI malignancies but can be remedied by preventative measures and a collaboration with dermatology.
Computational models help researchers anticipate how ADCs may behave in later lines of development, while they are still in the early stages.
ADC payloads with high levels of potency can sometimes lead to higher levels of toxicity, which can eliminate the therapeutic window for patients with cancer.
According to Greg Thurber, PhD, target-mediated uptake is the biggest driver of efficacy for antibody-drug conjugates as a cancer treatment.
Combining daratumumab with other agents is one strategy that investigators are exploring in the smoldering multiple myeloma field.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to expect at the 43rd Annual Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium, such as new chemotherapeutics and targeted therapies.
A substantial portion of patients who received daratumumab in the AQUILA study were able to delay disease progression to active multiple myeloma.
Results showed no “deleterious reactions” with chlorotoxin-directed cellular therapy in a small cohort of patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Although 1 of 21 patients with liver-dominant NETs died due to RILD in the phase 1 study, no RILD-induced deaths were observed in the phase 2 trial.
Related Content