Zolbetuximab Has Benefit in Targeting CLDN18.2 in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Commentary
Video

The incorporation of zolbetuximab in addition to chemotherapy has shown benefit in patients with Claudin 18.2–positive gastric cancers in clinical trials.

After assessment of Claudin 18.2–targeting therapies for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers for some time, 2 clinical trials have displayed benefit among patients with Claudin 18.2-positive disease, according to John L. Marshall, MD.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Marshall, physician executive director of the MedStar Washington DC Integrated Hematology-Oncology Division and the Otto J Ruesch Center for the Cure of GI Cancers, and chief medical officer of the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University, about what the FDA approval of zolbetuximab-clzb (Vyloy) plus fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy will mean for patients with locally advanced or unresectable Claudine 18.2–positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.1

Marshall emphasized a desire within the GI cancer field to develop therapies that treat new targets. He expressed a belief that the approval of zolbetuximab combination therapy in this patient population may benefit outcomes based on 2 clinical trials: the phase 3 SPOTLIGHT (NCT03504397) and phase 3 GLOW (NCT03653507) trials.2,3 He additionally highlighted an excitement to incorporate the therapy into practice in light of delays to the approval process.

Data from the phase 3 SPOTLIGHT trial published in The Lancet showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with zolbetuximab plus modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) vs FOLFOX6 alone; 10.61 months (95% CI, 8.90-12.48) and 8.67 months (95% CI, 8.21-10.28), respectively (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94; P = .0066). Additionally, 12-month PFS rates were 49% (95% CI, 42%-55%) vs 35% (95% CI, 28%-42%) in the respective arms; 24-month PFS rates were 24% (95% CI, 17%-32%) vs 15% (95% CI, 9%-22%).

Results from the phase 3 GLOW trial published in Nature Medicine showed a median PFS benefit with zolbetuximab plus capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) vs CAPOX alone; 8.21 months and 6.80 months, respectively (HR, 0.687; 95% CI, 0.544-0.866; P = .0007). In each respective arm, the 12-month PFS rates were 35% vs 19%, and the 24-month PFS rates were 14% vs 7%.

Transcript:

In GI cancers, we have been longing for new targets. We have been longing for new therapies. Finally, we are getting one. Claudin 18.2 has been out there for a while, and drug development targeting this has been going on for a while. Two big, randomized studies now support benefit [of zolbetuximab] in this patient population. Now, we are going to get the drug [approval]. We have been delayed a while by some other issues that have slowed the approvals, but we are excited, and we are all looking forward to incorporating [zolbetuximab] into our treatment paradigm.

References

  1. Astellas’ VYLOY™ (zolbetuximab-clzb) approved by U.S. FDA for treatment of advanced gastric and GEJ cancer. News release. Astellas Pharmaceuticals. October 18, 2024. Accessed October 23, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/5745k9a8
  2. Shitara K, Lordick F, Bang Y-J, et al. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPOTLIGHT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10389):1655-1668. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00620-7
  3. Shah MA, Shitara K, Ajani JA, et al. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial. Nat Med. 2023;29:2133-2141. doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02465-7
Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Related Content