Latest News

Satri-Cel Improves Survival vs Physician’s Choice in Pretreated Gastric/GEJ Cancer
Satri-Cel Improves Survival vs Physician’s Choice in Pretreated Gastric/GEJ Cancer

June 9th 2025

Satri-cel led to a median PFS of 3.25 months vs 1.77 months with physician’s choice in patients with pretreated gastric or gastroesophageal cancer.

Twice-Daily Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC
Twice-Daily Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC

June 6th 2025

THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC
THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC

June 5th 2025

Six or More Cycles of Chemo Prolong Survival With Atezolizumab in ES-SCLC
Six or More Cycles of Chemo Prolong Survival With Atezolizumab in ES-SCLC

June 4th 2025

Benmelstobart With/Without Anlotinib Is Effective Consolidation Therapy in NSCLC
Benmelstobart With/Without Anlotinib Is Effective Consolidation Therapy in NSCLC

June 3rd 2025

More News


Site Logo

Overview of Economic Analysis of Le Chevalier Vinorelbine Study

March 1st 1998

The costs and relative cost-effectiveness of different treatments for common illnesses are an increasing concern. New treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer are having an impact. However, these treatments vary markedly in their direct financial costs, toxicity, and quality-of-life profiles. Direct comparisons between most combination regimens are not yet completed. Vinorelbine (Navelbine) is the first new agent approved in the United States for the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in more than a decade. We previously reported results of a post-hoc economic analysis that compared the anticipated cost-effectiveness of three regimens used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (vinorelbine alone versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin [Platinol] versus vindesine plus cisplatin, the assumed standard treatment in Europe). Results showed that vinorelbine plus cisplatin was the most effective regimen. Using vinorelbine alone as a baseline, vinorelbine plus cisplatin added 56 days of life at an additional cost of $2,700, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $17,700 per year of life gained. Similarly, vindesine plus cisplatin added 19 days of life at a cost of $1,150, or $22,100 per year of life gained. Compared to vindesine plus cisplatin, vinorelbine plus cisplatin added 37 days of life at a cost of $1,570, or $15,500 per year of life gained. We conclude that the incremental cost-effectiveness of the vinorelbine plus cisplatin regimen was less than most commonly accepted medical interventions. If vinorelbine is preferred because of its favorable toxicity profile, the additional effectiveness of cisplatin added substantial efficacy at an acceptable cost.[ONCOLOGY(Suppl 4):14-17, 1998]