GIST patients resistant to imatinib/sunitinib respond to sorafenib

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 4
Volume 17
Issue 4

When GIST patients develop resistance to imatinib (Gleevec), second-line sunitinib (Sutent) has been shown to achieve a response rate of 7% and a median progression-free survival of 6.2 months. When patients progress on sunitinib, however, therapeutic options have been limited.

ORLANDO-When GIST patients develop resistance to imatinib (Gleevec), second-line sunitinib (Sutent) has been shown to achieve a response rate of 7% and a median progression-free survival of 6.2 months. When patients progress on sunitinib, however, therapeutic options have been limited.

University of Chicago investigators reported at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (abstract 7) that patients who progressed after treatment with both imatinib and sunitinib responded to sorafenib (Nexavar) 400 mg twice daily.

The multicenter, phase II study has enrolled 26 patients with unresectable c-KIT-expressing GIST, 58% of whom had metastasis to the liver and 73% to the peritoneum. Patients received a median of four 28-day cycles of sorafenib.

Six patients were treated after developing resistance only to imatinib, prior to sunitinib’s approval. Eighteen patients were resistant to both agents.

A partial response was observed in 3 of 24 patients (13%), while 14 patients (58%) achieved stable disease, for a total disease control rate of 71%, reported Halla S. Nimeiri, MD, an oncology fellow at the University of Chicago.

“It is noteworthy that several patients with stable disease experienced a significant improvement in symptoms in the absence of an objective response,” Dr. Nimeiri said.

Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months, median overall survival 13 months, and 1-year survival 62%.

By prior treatment, an exploratory analysis showed that progression-free survival was 3.4 months in patients resistant to just imatinib and 5.3 months for patients resistant to both agents, a nonsignificant difference.

Dose reductions were required by 67% of patients. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were primarily hand-foot syndrome (28%), hypertension (24%), and rash (20%). The study is continuing to accrue patients.

“It is marvelous how many new agents are available for patients with GIST today,” commented Paolo G. Casali, MD, Donald L. Bren Professor of Medicine, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Director of the Center for Immunology, University of California, Irvine.

“What is emerging is the possibility of extending survival by moving through several lines of therapy,” Dr. Casali said.

Based on Dr. Nimeiri’s findings and those of the Z9000 trial of adjuvant imatinib (see story above), he said, “one might give imatinib for 2 years, and upon resistance, sunitinib will add another 6 months progression-free survival. Upon further progression, sorafenib will add another 5 months.” He called this a vast improvement over a median survival of less than 3 years with surgery alone.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.