‘Absolutely Important’ to Develop Better Ways to Predict Kidney Cancer Recurrence, Says Expert

Video

Future research must address ways to improve the prediction of kidney cancer recurrence to better inform patients, says an expert from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.

Questions concerning disease recurrence among patients with renal cell carcinoma—a type of kidney cancer—need to be answered with future research, according to Axel Bex, MD, PhD, a urologic surgeon at the Specialist Centre For Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, and a professor at University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Bex about his presentation on new developments in adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Bex also said that the use of gene-expression profiles as predictive biomarkers of treatment response is another development in the field that is being explored in the BIONIKK trial (NCT02960906), which is evaluating nivolumab (Opdivo) and ipilimumab (Yervoy) in metastatic kidney cancer. Reducing the rate of overtreatment for metastatic kidney cancer is another important challenge, according to Bex.

Transcript:

First of all, we know from the metastatic setting that there are certain molecular subtypes that seem to predict that these patients respond better to immunotherapy, but they haven't made it into general practice yet as biomarkers. But as we heard here at SUO, there are some trials being planned.

We also have the BIONIKK trial in Europe, for example, that would look at certain gene expression profiles, and select patients who are much more likely to respond. Now, what we need to avoid in the future is there's a 40% over-treatment rate. That's something we already learned from [tumor growth inhibition] trials. It is absolutely important that we improve our prediction of recurrences. Patients want to know: do [my diseases] recur? And if so, is there something that helps me? And if there's something that helps me, is it likely that I will respond to it? These 2 questions need to be answered, and I think we have the tools.

Recent Videos
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Related Content