45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 25-26

45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

Background

TROP2 expression is higher in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs other breast cancer subtypes, and high expression is associated with poor prognosis. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as MK-2870/SKB264) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of anti-TROP2 antibody coupled to a cytotoxic belotecan derivative via a novel linker (average drug/antibody ratio, 7.4). In a prior phase 3 study OptiTROP-Breast01 (NCT05347134), sacituzumab tirumotecan alone improved progression-free survival (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22-0.45; P <.00001) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.78; P = .0005) vs chemotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated advanced TNBC. The current standard of care (SOC) for patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC is neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab after surgery. Patients who do not achieve pathological complete response (pCR) with the current SOC have higher rates of recurrence and mortality vs patients who achieve pCR. This study (NCT06393374) evaluates adjuvant sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice (pembrolizumab ± capecitabine) in patients with TNBC who received neoadjuvant therapy and did not achieve pCR at surgery.

Materials and Methods

This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study is enrolling patients 18 years and older with centrally confirmed TNBC per the most recent American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Patients have non-pCR after 5 or more cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, including 1 or more cycles of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy. Patients must provide tissue from the surgical specimen for central TROP2 assessment and be able to continue on adjuvant pembrolizumab. Randomization must be conducted 12 weeks or less from surgical resection (window may be extended in consult with the sponsor). Patients are randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks for 5 doses plus sacituzumab tirumotecan 4 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 12 doses or physician’s choice chemotherapy with pembrolizumab at 400 mg every 6 weeks for 5 doses with or without capecitabine at 1000 to 1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 and days 22 to 35 every 42 days for 4 cycles until completion of therapy or disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Randomization is stratified by residual tumor and lymph node status, TROP2 expression, and intention to use capecitabine. Primary end point is invasive disease-free survival. Secondary end points are OS, distant recurrence-free survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

Status

Enrollment began in Q2 2024.

Articles in this issue

TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content