46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 26-27

46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study

46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study

Background

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival (primary end points) vs neoadjuvant placebo plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant placebo in patients with high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). At the prespecified analysis of overall survival (OS; secondary end point; data cutoff, March 22, 2024), the HR favored pembrolizumab (0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87; P = .0015, crossing the prespecified significance boundary of 0.00503). We present OS results in prespecified subgroups based on residual cancer burden (RCB) and post hoc OS analyses in patients with baseline T2N0 disease.

Materials and Methods

Eligible patients with previously untreated, nonmetastatic, centrally confirmed TNBC (stage T1c N1-2 or T2-4 N0-2 per AJCC) were randomized 2:1 to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab at 200 mg every 3 weeks or placebo plus 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin, followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the subgroups for OS. HRs (95% CIs) for OS subgroups were based on the Cox regression model with the Efron method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate. RCB was assessed by the local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery.

Results

1174 patients were randomized to pembro (n = 784) or placebo (n = 390). At the data cutoff for OS (March 22, 2024), median follow-up was 75.1 months (range, 65.9-84.0). Data are shown in the Table. RCB rates were 63.5% with pembrolizumab vs 56.2% with placebo for RCB-0, 8.8% vs 11.5% for RCB-1, 18.4% vs 20.3% for RCB-2, and 5.1% vs 6.7% for RCB-3. At 5 years, OS rates (95% CIs) in patients with baseline T2N0 disease were 93.3% (89.9%-95.6%) with pembrolizumab vs 89.2% (83.2%-93.1%) with placebo. OS in subgroups based on PD-L1 expression will also be presented.

Conclusion

In patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab showed clinically meaningful improvements in OS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, with the highest OS benefit observed in patients with the least RCB.

Articles in this issue

45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content