49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 28-29

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

Background

Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) is approved for adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–), node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study describes clinical characteristics and treatment persistence in patients with HR+/HER2–, node positive early breast cancer initiating abemaciclib.

Materials and Methods

Data were accessed from the Flatiron Health electronic database. Adult patients with node-positive, stage I to III early breast cancer-initiating abemaciclib from October 2021 (FDA approval) to November 2022 at 150 mg twice daily (BID) were analyzed. The persistence rate was defined as the percentage of patients remaining on abemaciclib at 3 months, allowing for a 60-day or less medication gap.

Results

A cohort of 354 patients with a median follow-up time from abemaciclib initiation of 8.8 months were selected. The median age was 56 years, 25.4% were ≥65 years old, 12.7% were Black, 4.0% were Asian, and most patients (80.8%) received care in a community setting. Over half (55.4%) of patients were postmenopausal; 57.9% had an ECOG performance status (PS) 0, while 25.1% had ECOG PS 1. Approximately 33.9% had 1 or more comorbidity and 12.1% had 2 or more comorbidities with diabetes (14.1%) being the most frequent. Most patients had stage II (41.8%) or III (38.4%) disease, nodal status N1 (45.2%) or N2 (35.3%), and tumor grade 2 (52.3%). Abemaciclib was initiated at a median of 11.1 months after early breast cancer diagnosis. Prior to abemaciclib initiation, most patients received radiotherapy (96.3%) and chemotherapy (83.1%), with 46.3% receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Most patients (74.0%) initiated ET 1.6 months prior to abemaciclib initiation. The median time to abemaciclib initiation from breast surgery was 6.7 months. The most frequent regimen was abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitors (91.0%). At 3 months, 81.6% of patients were persistent; 5.6% resumed abemaciclib after more than 60-day interruption, and 11.3% discontinued due to adverse effects. Additional information on dose modifications will be presented.

Conclusion

In this real-world study of utilization of abemaciclib in the first year after approval for early breast cancer, an older, less fit, and more racially diverse population than participated in the monarchE trial, as well as a higher proportion of patients with lower nodal status was observed. The high 3-month persistence rate suggests abemaciclib for early breast cancer is well tolerated in routine clinical practice.

Articles in this issue

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content