49 Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement40th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 37
Issue suppl 4
Pages: 48-50

TABLE

TABLE

Background

Treatment for cancer poses a significant financial burden to patients. Patients with breast cancer (BC) are at particular risk for more financial hardship, given the long natural history of BC and the need for longitudinal multidisciplinary care. Financial toxicity (FT)—defined as the negative financial distress experienced by patients related to cancer treatment—is increasingly recognized as an adverse outcome of cancer care. FT encompasses the objective financial consequences of treatment costs and subjective financial concerns. The “toxicity” of cancer-related financial burden has been associated with worse quality of life, treatment nonadherence, and higher mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated financial stress among cancer patients, including increased debt and difficulty paying for health care and non–health care needs. While there is an increasing body of research exploring FT and its impact on patients, data on FT among patients with BC during COVID-19 are limited.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study of 669 patients with BC was recruited from the Ciitizen platform, breastcancer.org, and patient advocacy groups between March 30 and July 6, 2021. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, FT, and COVID-19 diagnosis history were collected via an online self-reported survey. FT was assessed with the validated COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) instrument. Higher COST scores indicate lower levels of FT.

Results

Of the 669 patients, the mean age was 51.6 years (range, 28–82), 83.9% were White, 99.0% were female, and 51.4% had metastatic BC (mBC). A total of 62 (9.3%) reported ever being diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean ± SD COST score was 22.7±10.8. The COST scores were significantly higher in patients with early BC (eBC) than mBC (24.2±11.3 vs 21.3±10.2; P <.001). COST scores did not significantly differ by COVID-19 diagnosis history (21.3±9.8 vs 22.9±10.9; P = .263). Using the FT grading cutoff, patients with mBC were more likely to experience FT (no FT, 33.7%; mild FT, 42.2%; moderate/severe FT, 24.1%) than patients with eBC (no FT, 48.3%; mild FT, 31.1%; moderate/ severe FT, 20.6%; P ≤ .001). No significant differences in the prevalence of FT were observed across racial groups or between patients with/without COVID diagnosis history. The Table shows key patient characteristics and FT.

Conclusions

Financial toxicity was common in patients with BC during COVID-19, particularly among those with mBC. The findings highlight the need to better understand financial burden to improve the quality of life in patients with mBC.

AFFILIATIONS:

Yan Wu,1,2 Xianchen Liu,2 Martine C. Maculaitis,3 Benjamin Li,2 Alexa Berk,4 Angelina Massa,4 Marisa C. Weiss,5 Lynn McRoy2

1Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.

2Pfizer Inc, New York, NY.

3Cerner Enviza, Malvern, PA.

4Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA.

5Breastcancer.org, Ardmore, PA.

Articles in this issue

1 Elacestrant Versus Fulvestrant or Aromatase Inhibitor in a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Elacestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Monotherapy for ER+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer
1 Elacestrant Versus Fulvestrant or Aromatase Inhibitor in a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating Elacestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Monotherapy for ER+/HER2– Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer
2 Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Patients Identifies Basal-Enriched Subset With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Real-world Data
2 Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Patients Identifies Basal-Enriched Subset With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Real-world Data
3 Real-world Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience
3 Real-world Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Institution Experience
4 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + Durvalumab (D) as First-Line (1L) Treatment for Unresectable Locally Advanced/ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (a/mTNBC): Updated Results From BEGONIA, a Phase 1b/2 Study
4 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) + Durvalumab (D) as First-Line (1L) Treatment for Unresectable Locally Advanced/ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (a/mTNBC): Updated Results From BEGONIA, a Phase 1b/2 Study
5 Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib Combinations as First- Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Realworld Settings in Argentina and Colombia: Results from the IRIS Study
5 Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib Combinations as First- Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Realworld Settings in Argentina and Colombia: Results from the IRIS Study
7 EMERALD Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Therapy in Patients With ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Results by Duration of Prior CDK4/6i in Metastatic Setting
7 EMERALD Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant Versus Standard-of- Care Endocrine Therapy in Patients With ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer: Updated Results by Duration of Prior CDK4/6i in Metastatic Setting
8 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple- Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study
8 Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple- Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study
9 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/ Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
9 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/ Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
11 Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Aged 75 Years or Above
11 Real-world Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Palbociclib Plus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Aged 75 Years or Above
12 TIP HARMONIA SOLTI-2101/ AFT-58: A Head-to-Head Phase III Study Comparing Ribociclib (RIB) and Palbociclib (PAL) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor– Positive/HER2-Negative/HER2- Enriched (HR+/HER2−/HER2-E) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC)
12 TIP HARMONIA SOLTI-2101/ AFT-58: A Head-to-Head Phase III Study Comparing Ribociclib (RIB) and Palbociclib (PAL) in Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor– Positive/HER2-Negative/HER2- Enriched (HR+/HER2−/HER2-E) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC)
13 Improved Sensitivity in Identification of ER- and HER2- Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancers With a Combination of Cell & Cell-Free Liquid Biopsy Analysis
13 Improved Sensitivity in Identification of ER- and HER2- Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancers With a Combination of Cell & Cell-Free Liquid Biopsy Analysis
15 Updated Expert Consensus Recommendations for Managing Hyperglycemia and Rash in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Alpelisib
15 Updated Expert Consensus Recommendations for Managing Hyperglycemia and Rash in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Alpelisib
16 Primary Results From the Randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice Trial of Premenopausal Patients With Aggressive HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy
16 Primary Results From the Randomized Phase II RIGHT Choice Trial of Premenopausal Patients With Aggressive HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy vs Physician’s Choice Combination Chemotherapy
17 A Clinical Systematic Literature Review of Treatments Among Patients With Advanced/ Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer
17 A Clinical Systematic Literature Review of Treatments Among Patients With Advanced/ Metastatic HER2+ Breast Cancer
20 TIP ELONA: An Open-Label, Phase 1b-2 Study of Elacestrant, in Combination With Onapristone in Patients With Estrogen Receptor– Positive, Progesterone Receptor– Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
20 TIP ELONA: An Open-Label, Phase 1b-2 Study of Elacestrant, in Combination With Onapristone in Patients With Estrogen Receptor– Positive, Progesterone Receptor– Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Related Content