56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 29-31

56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?

56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?

Background

BRCA mutations are often associated with a strong family history of breast and/or other cancers, leading to testing and screening before a diagnosis. Paternal family history genetic inheritance may be underrecognized, leading to BRCA testing done only at the time of diagnosis and hence later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. We investigated the differences in presentation and subsequent management between patients with maternal BRCA (M-BRCA) vs paternal BRCA (P-BRCA) lineage for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. To our knowledge, there are no current studies that exist in the published literature regarding the impact of BRCA lineage on breast cancer stage
and presentation.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were also BRCA positive from 2010 to 2022. Pedigree was reviewed, and the lineage of the mutation was assigned as definitively or likely paternal or maternal; we excluded patients whose lineage could not be determined. Comparisons were made between the inheritance groups using a 2-sample independent t-test and binomial regression models.

Results

A total of 219 patients who are BRCA-positive with newly diagnosed breast cancer were identified, with 134 patients meeting inclusion criteria where lineage could be determined (Table); 59 (44%) having P-BRCA, with 75 (55%) having M-BRCA. Overall, 111 (83%) had invasive cancer and 23 (17%) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). P-BRCA patients were more likely to be diagnosed with invasive cancer, compared with M-BRCA (91.5% vs 76.0%; P = .028), and more likely to be node-positive (23.7% vs 10.7%; P =.0498). There was a trend toward larger tumor size and receipt of neoadjuvant treatment for paternally linked BRCA mutation (23.6 mm vs 20.4 mm and 39.7% vs 29.3%); however, these were not significant. Patients with P-BRCA also tended to be diagnosed with cancer at a younger age compared with M-BRCA, were slightly more likely to be diagnosed with cancer before genetic testing, had fewer MRI-detected cancers and more detected by physical exam, but these were also not statistically significant.

Table. Patient Characteristics of Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of BRCA Mutation

Table. Patient Characteristics of Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of BRCA Mutation

Table. Patient Characteristics of Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of BRCA Mutation Cont.

Table. Patient Characteristics of Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of BRCA Mutation Cont.

Conclusion

Our results support the hypothesis that P-BRCA patients are more likely to present with later stage disease (invasive vs DCIS, node positivity) with a trend toward increased discovery of BRCA-positivity after diagnosis, and by physical exam in lieu of MRI. These data confirm the need for wider testing and awareness related to BRCA transmission through paternal lineage. A larger sample size may show statistical significance among trending variables.

Articles in this issue

20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
Recent Videos
Breast oncologist Jade E. Jones, MD, says she tries to send patients with BRCA-mutant HR-positive TNBC to clinical trials that use PARP inhibitors.
Following progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, ascertaining the endocrine sensitivity of HR-positive/HER2-negative disease may inform sequential treatment.
T-DXd improved progression-free survival over standard chemotherapy among patients with HR-positive/triple-negative breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content