72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 80-81

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Background/Significance

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure worldwide. Challenges to the management of breast cancer in this subgroup include management of native breast tissue, the implant, contralateral breast, the capsule, and the role of radiotherapy. Studies looking at breast conserving surgery, mastectomy, and reconstruction in this subgroup are limited. We aimed to assess current UK practice in managing breast cancer in this subgroup and to evaluate the safety and outcomes compared with national standards.

Materials and Methods

A national multicenter collaborative model was employed involving 24 UK units. Women diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ from January 2012 to January 2024 with preexisting implant augmentation were included. Clinicopathological data collected included type of surgery, management of the implant and capsule, contralateral surgery, complications, and adjuvant treatments.

Results

Data was collected on 212 women (median age, 51 years; IQR, 44-58). A total of 177 (83.5%) patients presented symptomatically, while 30 (14.2%) were detected through breast screening. Of the patients, 143 (67.5%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, with 28 (19.6%) requiring further margin reexcision and 4 (2.8%) needing completion mastectomy. In the breast-conserving surgery group, 108 (75.5%) patients retained or exchanged their implants and 111 (77.6%) did not have manipulation of the implant capsule. Implant or capsule exchange/surgery was lower in patients with implants in the subpectoral plane. Ninety-three percent of breast-conserving surgery patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Some 73 (34.4%) patients underwent mastectomy, of which 39 (53%) had reconstruction, predominantly implant-based (94%). Implant-related complications (infection, reoperation, implant loss) in the mastectomy groups were comparable or lower than in published national reconstruction audits.

Conclusion

This is the largest reported series of patients with breast cancer and prior cosmetic augmentation worldwide. Surgical management is diverse, with breast-conserving surgery and re-excision rates comparable to national standards but may be higher in patients with T2 tumors. In mastectomy patients, prior augmentation may be protective against complications such as implant loss. Prospective studies with long-term outcomes, including patient-reported outcome measures, are required to determine the optimal management for this subgroup of patients with breast cancer who still pose specific challenges.

Articles in this issue

2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
Recent Videos
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Related Content