72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 80-81

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Background/Significance

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure worldwide. Challenges to the management of breast cancer in this subgroup include management of native breast tissue, the implant, contralateral breast, the capsule, and the role of radiotherapy. Studies looking at breast conserving surgery, mastectomy, and reconstruction in this subgroup are limited. We aimed to assess current UK practice in managing breast cancer in this subgroup and to evaluate the safety and outcomes compared with national standards.

Materials and Methods

A national multicenter collaborative model was employed involving 24 UK units. Women diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ from January 2012 to January 2024 with preexisting implant augmentation were included. Clinicopathological data collected included type of surgery, management of the implant and capsule, contralateral surgery, complications, and adjuvant treatments.

Results

Data was collected on 212 women (median age, 51 years; IQR, 44-58). A total of 177 (83.5%) patients presented symptomatically, while 30 (14.2%) were detected through breast screening. Of the patients, 143 (67.5%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, with 28 (19.6%) requiring further margin reexcision and 4 (2.8%) needing completion mastectomy. In the breast-conserving surgery group, 108 (75.5%) patients retained or exchanged their implants and 111 (77.6%) did not have manipulation of the implant capsule. Implant or capsule exchange/surgery was lower in patients with implants in the subpectoral plane. Ninety-three percent of breast-conserving surgery patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Some 73 (34.4%) patients underwent mastectomy, of which 39 (53%) had reconstruction, predominantly implant-based (94%). Implant-related complications (infection, reoperation, implant loss) in the mastectomy groups were comparable or lower than in published national reconstruction audits.

Conclusion

This is the largest reported series of patients with breast cancer and prior cosmetic augmentation worldwide. Surgical management is diverse, with breast-conserving surgery and re-excision rates comparable to national standards but may be higher in patients with T2 tumors. In mastectomy patients, prior augmentation may be protective against complications such as implant loss. Prospective studies with long-term outcomes, including patient-reported outcome measures, are required to determine the optimal management for this subgroup of patients with breast cancer who still pose specific challenges.

Articles in this issue

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center
74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center
75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial
75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial
76 Electromagnetic Chip Bracketed vs Wire Bracketed Localization in Breast Conserving Surgery
76 Electromagnetic Chip Bracketed vs Wire Bracketed Localization in Breast Conserving Surgery
77 A Radio Opaque Suture May Improve Radiation Target Delineation in Post Lumpectomy Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
77 A Radio Opaque Suture May Improve Radiation Target Delineation in Post Lumpectomy Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
78 Comparison of Positive Margin Rate of Breast Cancer in Higher BMI Patients
78 Comparison of Positive Margin Rate of Breast Cancer in Higher BMI Patients
79 Case Series of Pathologic Upgrade After Reconstructive Breast Surgery
79 Case Series of Pathologic Upgrade After Reconstructive Breast Surgery
81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI
81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI
82 Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: A Phase 2 Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer
82 Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: A Phase 2 Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer
TPS 83 ELAINE 3: Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lasofoxifene Plus Abemaciclib for Treating Locally Advanced or Metastatic, ER+/HER2–, Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
TPS 83 ELAINE 3: Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lasofoxifene Plus Abemaciclib for Treating Locally Advanced or Metastatic, ER+/HER2–, Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
86 Elacestrant Combinations in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update From ELEVATE, a Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Umbrella Study
86 Elacestrant Combinations in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update From ELEVATE, a Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Umbrella Study
87 Elacestrant Plus Abemaciclib Combination in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
87 Elacestrant Plus Abemaciclib Combination in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
88 Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor, Administered the Same Day as Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Study
88 Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor, Administered the Same Day as Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Study
Recent Videos
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Related Content