74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 56

74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center

74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center

Background/Significance

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have revolutionized surgical care, aiming to optimize patient outcomes and reduce recovery time. In the realm of breast surgery, ERAS implementation in an ambulatory setting presents unique challenges and opportunities. Key components of the ERAS protocol included multimodal pain management, early mobilization, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, and optimized fluid management. Several elements were updated over the years. This study aims to share our experiences and lessons learned from implementing an ERAS program for breast surgery in a high-volume ambulatory center.

Design and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 8721 patients who underwent breast surgery between January 2016 and December 2023. The cases were performed with an ERAS protocol. We collected data on surgical volume, intraoperative and postoperative opioids measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), length of stay, PONV, and postoperative complications, which included transfers to main hospital and 30-day urgent care center visits.

Status

The volume increased 47% between 2016 and 2023. The implementation of the ERAS protocol resulted in significant reductions in intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirement (29% and 19%), PONV (41%), transfer (49%), 30-day urgent care center visits (43%), and 30-day readmissions (37%). There were no significant changes to length of stay.

The ERAS protocol implementation and improvement was associated with reduction in adverse outcomes despite substantial increase in the volume of cases. ERAS implementation in an ambulatory setting for breast surgery is feasible and can lead to substantial benefits for patients. However, challenges such as education, adherence to preoperative fasting guidelines, and managing unexpected complications remain. By addressing the unique challenges and tailoring the protocol to the ambulatory setting, optimal outcomes can be achieved. Future research should focus on further refining ERAS protocols and exploring innovative strategies to enhance patient outcomes.

Articles in this issue

29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Related Content