Moshe Ornstein, MD, discusses the heterogeneous population that comprise patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
There are different challenges for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) because of the heterogeneous population, according to Moshe Ornstein, MD.
Specifically, a multifaceted approach such as investigating comorbidities, looking at prior treatment resistance, and the subsequent lines of therapy, Ornstein, a medical oncologist from the Cleveland Clinic, noted.
Patients who have received numerous lines of prior therapy may have also developed resistance to the different therapeutic options. Ornstein emphasized the importance of clinicians needing to familiarize themselves with subsequent lines of therapy, not just the first line, because of this very issue.
Patients with advanced RCC are a heterogeneous patient population. Many of them are going to be in their 60s or 70s and have a variety of comorbidities. When we’re taking care of these patients, we need to consider hypertension, other vascular concerns, gastrointestinal issues, and any comorbidities that might impact treatment choice or how we manage for that patient to stay on therapy for as long as possible. Keeping those comorbidities in mind is important. Some of these patients who are on therapy, even with therapies that have response rates as high as 60% to 70%, will develop treatment resistance [at some point]. For those patients, it’s important to know not [only] what the frontline therapy is with the incredible advances of immunotherapy-based combinations, but also what those refractory lines of treatment are for the patients whose cancer progresses beyond an immunotherapy-based combination.
Hereditary Renal Tumor Syndromes and the Use of mTOR Inhibitors
A 47-year-old woman with a history of drug-resistant epilepsy during childhood presented to the emergency department with sudden dyspnea and chest pain. Upon admission, her oxygen saturation was 88%.
Belzutifan Improves PFS Across Subgroups for Advanced ccRCC
July 12th 2024“In LITESPARK-005, PFS and response rates favored belzutifan vs everolimus across [several patient subgroups, including] IMDC risk, number of prior lines [of therapy], and number of prior VEGF TKIs, specifically,” said Laurence Albiges, MD, PhD.