Abstract 8507

Article

Benefit of rituximab combined to ACVBP (R-ACVBP) over ACVBP in 209 poor- risk DLBCL patients treated with up-front consolidative autotransplantation: A GELA phase II trial (LNH 2003-3)

Benefit of rituximab combined to ACVBP (R-ACVBP) over ACVBP in 209 poor- risk DLBCL patients treated with up-front consolidative autotransplantation: A GELA phase II trial (LNH 2003-3)

N. Mounier, C. Gisselbrecht, O. Fitoussi, et al

Methods: This phase II study included 209 poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients < 60 years (median age 49) with 2 or 3 age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) factors. Of these, 58% presented with IPI 3-5 (93% with elevated LDH and 54% with extranodal sites > 1). Four cycles of an R-ACVBP regimen was given every 15 days. Complete response and partial response patients received a consolidative BEAM regimen and peripheral blood stem cell rescue.

Results: The complete response rate (CR/CRu) after induction in 176 patients was 61%, and the partial response rate (PR) was 24%, for an ORR of 85%. For the autotransplantation population (n = 175), CR/CRu was 73% and PR was 11 (84%). Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS) were estimated at 76% and 81%, respectively.

A case-controlled study matching the present R-ACVBP population with ACVBP patients selected from the LNH-98-3 trial showed 3-year PFS to be higher in the R-ACVBP group than among ACVBP patients (75% vs 58%, P = .0003). Three-year OS was estimated at 78% vs 67%, respectively (P = .05). The gain in 3-year OS was significant in patients who received auto transplantation: 89% vs 77% (P = .02).

Conclusions: These results with R-ACVBP induction and consolidative autotransplantation suggest a major survival benefit. A confirmatory prospective study is needed.

Recent Videos
2 KOLs are featured in this series.
2 KOLs are featured in this series.
Experts highlight methods for optimally treating patients with genitourinary cancers harboring variant histologies at World GU 2025.
Generally, the communication in academic oncology institutions is favorable; however, when oncologists and pathologists become busy, specimens may be sent to reference laboratories.
Related Content