Addressing Peripheral Neuropathy Post–Cilta-cel in Multiple Myeloma

Commentary
Video

Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.

Peripheral neuropathy may be a notable adverse effect (AE) following ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; Carvykti) infusion in those with multiple myeloma, and nurses must prepare to manage this toxicity to help patients maintain their lives, according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.

In a conversation with CancerNetwork® during the 2024 Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Congress, Applewhite, a registered nurse at the University of Rochester Medical Center, spoke about findings he presented from the phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827), and how they may relate to potential long-term toxicities associated with cilta-cel.

Given that peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel may affect how a patient walks and navigates the world, Applewhite stated that nurses should prepare to help patients walk differently and adjust to a new lifestyle.

In the CARTITUDE-4 trial, any-grade and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy affected 2.8% and 0.6% of patients who received treatment with cilta-cel, respectively. The median time to onset of peripheral neuropathy was 63 days, and patients had this toxicity for a median of 201 days. Additionally, investigators reported that 60.0% of peripheral neuropathy events eventually resolved.

Transcript:

Some of the more long-term [AEs] are still related to the neurological [AEs]. [Patients] may have developed peripheral neuropathy, which can change the way a patient walks and holds things, and that changes how they navigate the world. From a nursing standpoint, [you must] prepare your patient for understanding what it means to learn how to walk [differently] and maintain your life after having treatment with cilta-cel. They’re already at risk for peripheral neuropathy just from regular treatment that they may have already had.

But an expectation [nurses have] is just making sure that [patients] understand [and say], “You have a new lease on life. You have more time, and there may be additional things that you have to do to conform to that new life. But we’ll get you there.”

Reference

Applewhite I, Elfrink G, Esselmann J, Lonardi C, Florendo E, Sidiqi MH. Efficacy and adverse events after ciltacabtagene autoleucel treatment in the CARTITUDE-4 as-treated population consisting of patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy. Presented at: 2024 Oncology Nursing Society Congress; April 24-28, 2024; Washington DC.

Recent Videos
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Related Content