AIs vs Tamoxifen: Results of EBCTG Meta-Analyses

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 2
Volume 18
Issue 2

Based on 2 meta-analyses of nearly 20,000 HR+ early breast cancer patients, AIs are superior to tamoxifen in reducing recurrences, whether as initial monotherapy or given in a “switching” strategy (abstract 12).

Based on 2 meta-analyses of nearly 20,000 HR+ early breast cancer patients, AIs are superior to tamoxifen in reducing recurrences, whether as initial monotherapy or given in a “switching” strategy (abstract 12). As initial monotherapy, AIs reduced the risk of recurrence by 23% over tamoxifen; for patients who switched to AIs after 2–3 yr of tamoxifen, AIs reduced the risk by 29%, relative to those who continued on tamoxifen, James Ingle, MD, reported.

The study was based on data submitted to the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group from 6 major trials. In cohort 1 (n = 9,856), patients receiving endocrine monotherapy (tamoxifen or an AI alone for a total of 5 yr), recurrences were seen in 15.3% of AI users at 8 yr post-diagnosis, vs 19.2% of tamoxifen users (P < .00001).

Study Results

“Compared with tamoxifen, AI monotherapy was associated with a highly significant absolute gain of 2.9% at 5 yr and 3.9% at 8 yr of patients who remained free of breast cancer recurrence,” Dr. Ingle said. AI use was associated with a decrease in breast cancer mortality of 1.1% at 5 yr and 0.5% at 8 yr compared with tamoxifen but this was not statistically significant.

Cohort 2 (n = 9,015) involved patients who, aft er 2–3 yr of tamoxifen, were randomized to continue tamoxifen for a total of 5 yr or to switch to an AI to complete their 5 yr of adjuvant endocrine therapy. At 6 yr post-randomization, breast cancer recurred in 12.6% of those switched to an AI vs 16.1% of those who continued on tamoxifen. The overall comparison of time to recurrence was highly significant (P < .00001).

Breast cancer mortality was significantly reduced with the use of AIs in the switching cohort, yielding an absolute reduction of 0.7% at 3 yr and 1.6% at 6 yr from treatment divergence.

Patients saw the most differential benefit from AIs while still on therapy vs after discontinuation. “There is a change when patients go off therapy, but AIs are still better,” Dr. Ingle noted. “AI treatment duration is now a major question to be answered.”

Recent Videos
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Related Content