Alexander Spira, MD, PhD, Discusses Safety and Efficacy of Mobocertinib in EGFR ex20ins+ NSCLC Following Prior EGFR TKIs

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Alexander Spira, MD, PhD, FACP, at the 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer to talk about clinical benefits of using mobocertinib in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer.

At the 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer, CancerNetwork® spoke with Alexander Spira, MD, PhD, FACP, of Virginia Cancer Specialists, about how mobocertinib led to antitumor activity in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated in a phase 1/2 study (NCT02716116) following prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.

Transcript:

This is a subset analysis of a study of mobocertinib that has been going on for quite some time. It started as a phase 1 study, and this looked at a specific population of patients who got prior TKI therapy against [EGFR] exon 20. [Prior therapy] included experimental drugs, [such as] afatinib [Gilotrif], osimertinib [Tagrisso], and other [EGFR] exon 20 drugs like poziotinib. [The goal of the study was to] see how well [patients] did when they were treated with mobocertinib.

What we learned from this study is that patients who got prior TKI were able to benefit from mobocertinib, which was good news. Some of these TKIs were specific against [EGFR] exon 20, such as poziotinib, while others were not necessarily [EGFR] exon 20 specific, but more broad TKIs such as afatinib or osimertinib. My take home on this is that there is at least some evidence of efficacy of mobocertinib in patients who got other TKIs prior [to treatment] so we’re hoping that mobocertinib serves as a best in class compared to the other TKIs that are out there.

Reference

Spira A, Ramalingam SS, Neal J, et al. Mobocertinib in EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive metastatic NSCLC patients with disease control on prior EGFR TKI therapy. Presented at: 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer; September 8-14, 2021. Virtual. Abstract OA15.01.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Related Content