ASCO’s Bailes Exhorts Cancer Community to Band Together to Influence Public Policy

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 12 No 5
Volume 12
Issue 5

Proposed changes in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement have “enormous implications for appropriate cancer treatment,” according to Joseph S. Bailes, MD, winner of this year’s Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) National Achievement Award. Accepting the prize at the ACCC’s 24th Annual National Meeting, Bailes, chairman of the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), added that he’s very concerned about the proposed changes. But he told of plans to streamline and strengthen ASCO’S public policy apparatus by: establishing a “more constant presence” in Congress; bringing all cancer professionals, advocacy groups, and academics under a single “big tent,” and solidifying ties with the patient community.

Proposed changes in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement have “enormous implications for appropriate cancer treatment,” according to Joseph S. Bailes, MD, winner of this year’s Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) National Achievement Award. Accepting the prize at the ACCC’s 24th Annual National Meeting, Bailes, chairman of the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), added that he’s very concerned about the proposed changes. But he told of plans to streamline and strengthen ASCO’S public policy apparatus by: establishing a “more constant presence” in Congress; bringing all cancer professionals, advocacy groups, and academics under a single “big tent,” and solidifying ties with the patient community.

Bailes received ACCC’s highest honor in recognition of his “outstanding contributions to community cancer care” at the “national policy level,” which have an “importance equal to or even greater than” those at the “bench or lab,” said ACCC President James L. Wade III, MD, FACP, in introducing Bailes at a special awards luncheon. Bailes broke new ground in bringing together “community and university oncologists, patient advocacy groups and members of Congress to assure patient access to community cancer care,” Wade said.

Shift in Focus Toward Reimbursement Issues
Key to his mission as chairman of ASCO’s Clinical Practice Committee (CPC), Bailes declared, was creating a “policy coordination team second to none” on Capitol Hill and elsewhere in the government. A decade of change in oncology has seen a “reconfigured” CPC, as well as the opening of ASCO’s Washington office and its new regulatory and legislative representation by the Washington law firm of Fox, Bennett, and Turner.

Where a decade ago ASCO concentrated its energies on its annual meeting, which was dominated by academics and medical oncologists, and limited its advocacy efforts to the National Cancer Institute, ASCO has since taken a leading role in efforts to obtain more and better reimbursement for cancer care. It has developed a free-standing, full-time office; developed an active state affiliate program; admitted nonacademics and nonmedical oncologists to leadership roles; and brought more practitioners into the membership. Because of these changes, ASCO was heavily involved in the health insurance reform debate of 1993-1994, Bailes said, adding that services to clinicians now include a hotline to answer questions about reimbursement and symposia on managed care.

Key Future Issues
Looking to the future, Bailes said that “the practice expense issue has to be resolved....You can’t take out one element of payment when the chemotherapy codes are underreimbursed.” Seeing that those codes “are properly reimbursed” is a high priority, he added. “The drug reimbursement issue is not going to go away,” he added. Access to clinical trials, especially industry trials, must be expanded, he said, and ASCO also intends to “continue our dialog with FDA” to facilitate early access to lifesaving therapy and dissemination of off-label drug information.

“Make sure that your patients understand what goes into cancer care,” he told the gathering, adding that patients are the “best PR” for oncology.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content