Axillary Dissection May Be Unnecessary for Many Breast Cancer Patients

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 10
Volume 13
Issue 10

A new decision-making model developed by Dr.Giovanni Parmigiani and colleagues at Duke University has shown that the routine use of axillary lymph node dissection may not be necessary for many breast cancer patients. Recently, the use of

A new decision-making model developed by Dr.Giovanni Parmigiani and colleagues at Duke University has shown that the routine use of axillary lymph node dissection may not be necessary for many breast cancer patients. Recently, the use of axillary dissection has been questioned because lymph node status may not alter adjuvant therapy and because the survival benefit resulting from a change in adjuvant therapy would be small.

Only a Select Group of Patients May Benefit

The decision-making model was developed to quantify the survival benefits of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving therapy. According to the model, axillary dissection only provides a small survival benefit in this population and is of greatest benefit to estrogen receptor positive women with small primary tumors who might not be eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy because their lymph nodes are negative. The model suggests that routine use of axillary lymph node dissection should be reassessed, and may be necessary only in select groups of patients.

Axillary lymph node dissection can cause numbness, swelling, and a decreased range of motion of the shoulder. Because of these side effects, sentinel node biopsy is currently being examined as a less invasive alternative.

Future studies will explore the use of the decision model as a counseling tool to help physicians and patients make better informed decisions regarding axillary lymph node dissection.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content