Best Practices for Referring Patients for CAR T Therapy

Opinion
Video

Panelists discuss the growing importance of early integration and collaboration between community oncologists and specialized centers in the evolving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy landscape for multiple myeloma, emphasizing timely referrals, coordinated care, and strategic sequencing with other immunotherapies to optimize patient outcomes.

As CAR T-cell therapy continues to evolve, it’s becoming clear that early integration into the myeloma treatment landscape will be essential. With growing experience, toxicities are being better managed, and the therapy is becoming more accessible. Community oncologists will increasingly encounter patients either undergoing or returning from CAR T treatment, making strong collaboration with specialized centers vital. Early referrals are crucial—not just for eligibility assessment but also to prepare patients and optimize access to this potentially transformative therapy before multiple relapses complicate their course.

The promise of CAR T lies not only in its deep responses but also in the durability of those responses, with emerging long-term data sparking discussions around functional cures in a subset of patients. Yet, CAR T isn’t a stand-alone solution; it will often be used in sequence with bispecifics and other immunotherapies. The key is not to choose one over the other but to work toward selecting the right therapy at the right time. Community clinicians, by collaborating with myeloma specialists, play a critical role in ensuring patients are considered for advanced treatments early and receive individualized, up-to-date care.

As the treatment landscape becomes more complex and fast moving, community providers don’t need to have all the answers—but they do need strong connections with academic centers. Even though myeloma remains a rare disease, the pace of change is rapid, and guidance from specialized teams is invaluable. By working together—academic and community providers alike—we can ensure each patient receives the most effective and timely therapy, grounded in current evidence and tailored to their specific clinical needs.

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
With many treatments emerging in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer landscape, sequencing therapy has emerged as a key consideration for these patients.
Related Content