Better Ovarian Cancer Outcome With IP Cisplatin

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 4 No 6
Volume 4
Issue 6

LOS ANGELES--Administration of cisplatin (Platinol) by the intraperitoneal rather than intravenous route to patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer reduced toxicity and improved survival by about 25%, David S. Alberts, MD, said at the ASCO meeting.

LOS ANGELES--Administration of cisplatin (Platinol) by the intraperitonealrather than intravenous route to patients with optimally debulkedstage III ovarian cancer reduced toxicity and improved survivalby about 25%, David S. Alberts, MD, said at the ASCO meeting.

In this Intergroup study of 544 patients, the largest prospectivephase III trial ever performed in ovarian cancer, median survivalafter more than 50 months of follow-up was 51 months on the IParm vs 41 months on the IV therapy arm, a significant difference.

The IP to IV death hazard ratio was .75. "Thus, at any timeduring this study and its follow-up, there was a 25% greater likelihoodof being alive if the patient was treated with IP therapy,"said Dr. Alberts, deputy director, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson.There were 171 deaths on the IV arm vs 143 on the IP arm.

Patients in the study had less than 2 cm residual tumor afterprimary surgery (more than 70% had less than 0.5 cm) and werestratified according to degree of residual disease and performancestatus before randomization.

They then received cisplatin, 100 mg/m², either IV or IP(in 2 liters of saline), plus IV cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m²,every 3 weeks for six cycles.

Patients on IP therapy had significantly less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia,which was not unexpected, since the peak plasma level of the drugis dramatically reduced with IP delivery. More IP patients hadabdominal pain, but this was well controlled with narcotics.

The IP patients also had a significantly lower incidence of tinnitusand clinical hearing loss (5% clinical hearing loss of grade 2or greater vs 14% on the IV arm).

Recent Videos
Oncologists are still working on management strategies for neuropathy; a common adverse effect related to chemotherapeutics for ovarian cancer.
Genetic testing information can be used to risk-stratify ovarian cancer survivors for breast cancer, particularly those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Genetic testing for ovarian cancer may help inform treatment decisions for patients with advanced disease, particularly regarding PARP inhibitor use.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Related Content