Capecitabine-Based Combination Proves Comparable to Standard Therapy in Esophagogastric Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 22 No 1
Volume 22
Issue 1

Data published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that oral capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with epirubicin (Ellence) is a comparable alternative to infused fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin with epirubicin in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Data published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that oral capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with epirubicin (Ellence) is a comparable alternative to infused fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin with epirubicin in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophagogastric cancer. In the study, median survival time was longer and 1-year survival was higher among patients taking EOX (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine) compared to the standard treatment, ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU).

"Our research suggests that oral Xeloda and oxaliplatin can provide patients with a valuable option over the standard regimen of infused fluorouracil and cisplatin in combination with epirubicin as a first-line therapy for esophagogastric cancer," stated lead investigator David Cunningham, MD, frcp, head of the Gastrointestinal and Lymphoma Units of the Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust of Surrey and London.

About the Study

The phase III REAL 2 study was conducted in 1,002 advanced esophagogastric cancer patients from 61 centers mainly in the United Kingdom. The study aimed to establish the potential use of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients, and the primary endpoint was noninferiority in overall survival in patients who received capecitabine compared to those who received fluorouracil and for those who took oxaliplatin compared to cisplatin.

Patients were randomized to one of four regimens. Median survival times in the ECF, ECX (epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine), EOF (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/5-FU) and EOX groups were 9.9, 9.9, 9.3, and 11.2 months, respectively; 1-year survival rates were 37.7%, 40.8%, 40.4%, and 46.8%, respectively. In a secondary analysis, overall survival was statistically significantly longer with EOX than with ECF, with a hazard ratio of 0.80 in the EOX group (95% confidence interval = 0.66–0.97; P = .02).

Recent Videos
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Related Content