Capecitabine-Based Combination Proves Comparable to Standard Therapy in Esophagogastric Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 22 No 1
Volume 22
Issue 1

Data published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that oral capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with epirubicin (Ellence) is a comparable alternative to infused fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin with epirubicin in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Data published in the New England Journal of Medicine show that oral capecitabine (Xeloda) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with epirubicin (Ellence) is a comparable alternative to infused fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin with epirubicin in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophagogastric cancer. In the study, median survival time was longer and 1-year survival was higher among patients taking EOX (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine) compared to the standard treatment, ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU).

"Our research suggests that oral Xeloda and oxaliplatin can provide patients with a valuable option over the standard regimen of infused fluorouracil and cisplatin in combination with epirubicin as a first-line therapy for esophagogastric cancer," stated lead investigator David Cunningham, MD, frcp, head of the Gastrointestinal and Lymphoma Units of the Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust of Surrey and London.

About the Study

The phase III REAL 2 study was conducted in 1,002 advanced esophagogastric cancer patients from 61 centers mainly in the United Kingdom. The study aimed to establish the potential use of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients, and the primary endpoint was noninferiority in overall survival in patients who received capecitabine compared to those who received fluorouracil and for those who took oxaliplatin compared to cisplatin.

Patients were randomized to one of four regimens. Median survival times in the ECF, ECX (epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine), EOF (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/5-FU) and EOX groups were 9.9, 9.9, 9.3, and 11.2 months, respectively; 1-year survival rates were 37.7%, 40.8%, 40.4%, and 46.8%, respectively. In a secondary analysis, overall survival was statistically significantly longer with EOX than with ECF, with a hazard ratio of 0.80 in the EOX group (95% confidence interval = 0.66–0.97; P = .02).

Recent Videos
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content