Children's Oncology Group AALL1331: Phase III Trial of Blinatumomab in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Low-Risk B-Cell ALL in First Relapse

News
Article

Results from the phase 3 COG ALL1331 trial found the use of blinatumomab for pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia improved efficacy.

Results from the phase 3 COG ALL1331 trial found the use of blinatumomab for pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia improved efficacy.

Results from the phase 3 COG ALL1331 trial found the use of blinatumomab for pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia improved efficacy.

Results from a confirmatory Phase 3 trial (COG ALL1331), published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, have demonstrated that blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) which engages CD19 and CD3, was well tolerated and improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for two thirds of patients with bone marrow (BM) ± extramedullary (EM) relapse B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Conversely, outcomes in patients with central nervous system (CNS) relapse remained poor, regardless of blinatumomab administration. These findings establish a new standard of care for the responsive population.

Blinatumomab is FDA approved for adults and children with B-ALL, has received accelerated approval for minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive B-ALL, and has a favorable toxicity profile. Previously, high- and intermediate-risk B-ALL patients were found to have improved OS following HSCT when treated with blinatumomab. This study aimed to determine if blinatumomab improves outcomes for children, adolescents, and young adults with LR first relapse B-ALL without undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transfer (HSCT). This clinical trial enrolled 669 patients (age 1­–30 years) with low-risk first relapse B-ALL and randomly assigned 255 eligible patients to receive either blinatumomab or chemotherapy after reinduction therapy. The median follow-up was 3.5 years (range 25 days-6.6 years, IQR, 2.5-4.7 years).

Administration of blinatumomab improved DFS and OS for patients with BM relapse with or without EM disease (n = 174; 68.2% of randomly assigned patients). The 4-year DFS (p = .015) and OS (p = .020) were, respectively, 72.7% ± 5.8% and 97.1% ± 2.1% for blinatumomab versus 53.7% ± 6.7% and 84.8% ± 4.8% for chemotherapy. Patients with isolated CNS relapse had poor outcomes regardless of blinatumomab administration. Compared to chemotherapy, blinatumomab blocks were associated with lower rates of severe toxicity, including febrile neutropenia (3% v 48%; p < .001), infections (5% v 51%; p < .001), sepsis (0% v 11%; p < .001), anemia (13% v 58%; p < .001), and mucositis (1% v 7%; p = .018). Patients with isolated EM (IEM) relapses did poorly with both arms, particularly those with isolated CNS (iCNS) relapse. Blinatumomab was effective in preventing second relapses in the BM ± EM group but not in the CNS. Younger age, longer time from initial diagnosis to relapse, and undetectable MRD were predictive of better outcomes in the BM ± EM group. Overall, blinatumomab improved outcomes for LR B-ALL patients with BM ± EM relapses but not for those with IEM and iCNS relapses.

Reference

Hogan LE, Brown PA, Ji L, et al. Children's Oncology Group AALL1331: phase III trial of blinatumomab in children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk B-cell ALL in first relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(25):4118-4129. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.02200

Recent Videos
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.
The medical characteristics of a patient may heavily factor into the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibition for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Related Content