Choueiri Discusses Results of CLEAR Substudy of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in RCC

Video

At 2022 ASCO GU, Toni K. Choueiri, MD, discussed the CLEAR study and how East Asian patients with renal cell carcinoma derived similar benefit with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as the overall trial population.

During the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, CancerNetwork® spoke with Toni K. Choueiri, MD, director of Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and director of the Kidney Cancer Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute as well as Jerome and Nancy Kohlber Chair and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, about the CLEAR study (NCT02811861).1 This current analysis examined the safety of lenvatinib (Lenvima) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) vs sunitinib (Sutent) in a subgroup of East Asian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Transcript:

The CLEAR study was the first 3-arm study of the doublet of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or lenvatinib/everolimus versus sunitinib as standard of care. This led to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab being approved based on, not just the PFS [progression-free survival], but an OS [overall survival] and response rate benefit.2 There were always questions since we started using target therapy, for over a decade now, if Asian patients will have a different profile, activity, or efficacy, but there was none here in the study. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab benefited patients from Asia and there was no difference compared to overall population.

References

1. Young Rha S, Choueiri TK, Matveev VB, et al. Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) versus sunitinib (SUN) in the East Asian subset of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the phase 3 CLEAR trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):338. doi 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.338

2. FDA approves lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma. News Release. FDA. August 10, 2021. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://bit.ly/3K5b3lZ

Recent Videos
Ongoing studies in kidney cancer aim to explore determinants of immune-related adverse effects and strategies for mitigating them.
Machine learning-based approaches may play a role in further understanding of how somatic alterations influence responses or resistance to therapy.
Data from a first-in-disease trial assessing a personalized cancer vaccine in RCC require validation at a larger level, according to David Braun, MD, PhD.
Blood-based markers of note in kidney cancer prognosis include circulating tumor DNA and proteomic markers, according to Michael B. Atkins, MD.
Clinical trials still have a role in improving outcomes with immunotherapy among those with kidney cancer.
Current research initiatives in the kidney cancer field include exploring anti–PD-1, anti–LAG-3, and anti–CTLA-4 combination regimens.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Related Content