Cisplatin/Gemcitabine/Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) Phase II Study

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

The purpose of this study was to define the antitumor activity of the PGT (cisplatin [Platinol]/gemcitabine [Gemzar]/paclitaxel [Taxol]) combination in chemonaive non–small-cell lung cancer patients.

The purpose of this study was to define the antitumor activity of the PGT (cisplatin [Platinol]/gemcitabine [Gemzar]/paclitaxel [Taxol]) combination in chemonaive non–small-cell lung cancer patients.

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were considered eligible if they were £ 70 years old and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. They received cisplatin 50 mg/m², paclitaxel 125 mg/m², and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² days 1 and 8, every 3 week.

Beginning in April 1997, 39 patients with stage IIIB (13 patients) or IV (26) disease were enrolled for a total of 158 cycles delivered. The ECOG performance status was 0–1 in 31 patients and 2 in 8 patients. Of the 39 patients, 38 were evaluable for response on an intent-to-treat basis. Two complete responses and 24 partial responses have been recorded for a 68% (95% CI: 51%–82%) overall response rate. Major responses were 10/13 (77%) in stage IIIB patients and 16/25 (64%) in stage IV patients.

Patients’ quality-of-life (QoL) score improved in 27/38 (71%) patients. At a 13-month (range: 1–23 months) median follow-up the median survival time was 13.5 months, with a 1-year projected survival of 70%.

Toxicity was generally manageable. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 9 (23%) and 3 (8%) patients, respectively, and in 6 cases a packed red blood cell transfusion was required. Severe nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 8 patients.

CONCLUSION: The PGT combination yields very high clinical response and QoL improvement in chemonaive advanced NSCLC patients, at a price of manageable toxicity. A large phase III trial comparing this new regimen to standard combinations is underway.

Click here for Dr. Vincent A. Miller’s commentary on this abstract.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.
Related Content