Clinical Implications of MajesTEC-1

Opinion
Video

Amrita Y. Krishnan, MD, and Binod Dhakal, MD, discuss the clinical implications of data from MajesTEC-1 and provide key takeaways on the evolving relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treatment landscape.

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:

  • Based on the long-term efficacy and safety data presented for teclistamab in the MajesTEC-1 trial, what are your key takeaways or clinical implications for the use of this agent in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM)?
  • Despite the promising results with teclistamab, what potential unmet needs or areas for further research and development remain in the treatment of R/R MM?
Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
2 experts in this video
Related Content