Company asks for new survival data on Eloxatin label

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 3
Volume 17
Issue 3

Sanofi-aventis’ supplemental New Drug Application for Eloxatin (oxaliplatin) has been accepted by FDA and assigned priority review status. The sNDA proposes changes to the Eloxatin prescribing information to include long-term survival data from the MOSAIC trial.

BRIDGEWATER, New Jersey-Sanofi-aventis’ supplemental New Drug Application for Eloxatin (oxaliplatin) has been accepted by FDA and assigned priority review status. The sNDA proposes changes to the Eloxatin prescribing information to include long-term survival data from the MOSAIC trial.

The company is seeking the inclusion of 6-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival data from the trial in stage III colon cancer patients treated with either FOLFOX4 (Eloxatin-based chemotherapy regimen) or standard infusional 5-FU/LV-based chemotherapy alone, following surgery.

A priority review designation sets the target date for the completion of FDA’s review of the proposed changes at or before 6 months from the date of filing.

In the MOSAIC trial, stage III colon cancer patients receiving Eloxatin-based therapy had a significant reduction (20%) in the risk of dying after a median of 6 years, compared with standard 5-FU/LV-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.80, P = .023). Also, disease-free survival was improved by 22% in stage III patients (HR 0.78, P = .005).

The phase III MOSAIC study, conducted at 148 centers in 20 countries, included 2,246 patients with stage II or III colon cancer.

Based on MOSAIC, in 2004 FDA approved Eloxatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV for the treatment of stage III colon cancer patients who have their primary tumors surgically removed. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival at 3 years, with overall survival as a secondary endpoint. At the time of the original analysis, with 4 years’ median follow-up, there was no demonstrated overall survival benefit.

 

Recent Videos
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Related Content