Congressman Honored by Society of Surgical Oncology for Support of Cancer Research

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 12 No 4
Volume 12
Issue 4

Congressman John B. Porter (R-IL), an advocate of biomedical research funding, was awarded the 1998 James Ewing Layman’s Award at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) in San Diego, California. The award is presented annually to a nonphysician who has made a significant contribution to improving the care of cancer patients.

Congressman John B. Porter (R-IL), an advocate of biomedical research funding, was awarded the 1998 James Ewing Layman’s Award at the 51st Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) in San Diego, California. The award is presented annually to a nonphysician who has made a significant contribution to improving the care of cancer patients.

A supporter of the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health (NIH), including the National Cancer Institute, Congressman Porter has championed cancer research. His contributions have helped to increase NIH funding and limit the impact of politics in research decision making, ensuring continuation of research and progress in cancer management.

Initiative to Raise NIH Funding
Chairman of the House Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee, John Porter launched an ongoing initiative to raise NIH funding in 1995 at the same time congressional committees were proposing 5 years of deep NIH budget cuts. Assembling biotechnology and pharmaceutical company CEO’s, representatives from the research community, and key legislators in a pivotal meeting to share perspectives, he succeeded in gaining support for a 5.7% NIH increase.

“There are many priorities before us,” Congressman Porter explained. “But none is higher than biomedical research through the NIH. All the costs of research at NIH through its entire history have been covered by the health care savings from just one discovery. And there have been tens of thousands of similar discoveries over the last few decades,” he added.

Congressman Porter’s commitment to research funding continues to gain momentum. In the past year, NIH appropriations increased by 7.1%. The congressman’s goal is to see NIH funding double over the next 5 years.

Recognized as one of Congress’s most fiscally conservative legislators, Porter supports basic research through NIH alongside deficit reductions and balanced budgets. The two are not at odds, he explains. “Federally-supported biomedical research creates high-skill jobs, helps retain America’s worldwide leadership in biomedical research, and supports the biotechnology industry that generates economic growth and a positive balance of trade for our country. Medical research provides great hope for effectively treating, curing and eventually preventing disease, thereby saving our country billions of dollars in annual health care costs,” he said.

Efforts to Keep Politics out of Research Decisions
Congressman Porter is equally diligent in his efforts to keep politics out of research decision-making. There is growing pressure to earmark funds for research to specific diseases. Despite political pressure to pit one disease against another for funding, however, his subcommittee funds the NIH as a whole, without tying funds to specific disease research. Congressman Porter also has been instrumental in educating his congressional colleagues on the importance of keeping medical research decisions in the hands of researchers.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital recently honored Porter for his support of biomedical research. The National Taxpayers Union and Watchdogs of the Treasury have also recognized the congressman for fiscal conservancy. In addition, he was named “Taxpayer Superhero” in 1994 by the Grace Commission Citizens Against Government Waste.

Recent Videos
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Related Content