Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Around the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Crenigacestat Sees Little Clinical Activity at Recommended Phase 1 Dose in R/R T-ALL/T-LBL

November 7, 2020
By Hannah Slater
News
Article

For adult patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, a phase 1 clinical trial revealed that crenigacestat (LY3039478) demonstrated little clinical activity at the recommended dose.

For adult patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)/T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL), phase 1 trial results published in Cancer revealed that crenigacestat (LY3039478) demonstrated little clinical activity at the recommended dose.

The study also went on to suggest that the clinical development of crenigacestat for these patient populations may have been limited by gastrointestinal toxicities.

“The limited efficacy of crenigacestat in this study could be due to several reasons, including dosing interruptions due to gastrointestinal toxicities and less dependence of the disease on the Notch pathway after multiple relapses,” the authors explained.

In this multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study in adult patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL/T-LBL, participants received crenigacestat orally 3 times per week plus 24 mg of dexamethasone (Ozurdex) twice daily on days 1 to 5 every other week in a 28-day cycle. The starting dose of crenigacestat was 50 mg, and dose escalation was performed with a modified 3+3 scheme for the estimation of dose-limiting toxicity at the recommended dose level.

Thirty-six patients with T-ALL (n = 31 [86.1%]) or T-LBL (n = 5 [13.9%]) were treated with the crenigacestat-dexamethasone combination. In total, 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, including 2 of 12 (16.7%) in the 75-mg cohort (grade 4 gastrointestinal hemorrhage and grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea), 1 of 15 (6.7%) in the 100-mg cohort (grade 3 diarrhea), and 3 of 3 (100%) in the 125-mg cohort (grade 3 diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting). Moreover, 28 patients (77.8%) experienced 1 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) related to the study treatment.

The maximum tolerated dose was 75 mg of crenigacestat plus 24 mg of dexamethasone daily on days 1 to 5. Based on this, the recommended phase 2 dose of crenigacestat for patients with T-ALL/T-LBL is 75 mg 3 times per week in combination with dexamethasone.

“The recommended dose in this study is higher than the established dose for solid tumors (50 mg 3 times per week),” the authors noted. “It was hoped that the combination with steroids would improve the tolerance for crenigacestat treatment; however, gastrointestinal toxicities such as diarrhea and colitis persisted.”

The best overall response was a confirmed response, with 1 patient (2.8%) having a duration of response of 10.51 months. Further, 6 patients (16.7%) achieved stable disease, and 12 patients (33.3%) experienced progressive disease. The remaining 17 patients (47.2%) were not evaluable. The median event-free survival was 1.18 months (95% CI, 0.76-2.14 months) among all dose groups.

Plasma amyloid β (Aβ) levels were also used as biomarkers to determine the pharmacodynamic effects of crenigacestat in the study participants. The average maximal plasma Aβ inhibition on day 1 was found to have increased from 66% after 50 mg of crenigacestat to 87% after 100 to 125 mg of crenigacestat.

“Future trials to explore crenigacestat in combination with targeted agents and chemotherapy will need to focus on less advanced patients and possibly a dose even lower than the phase 2 dose identified in the current trial,” the authors wrote. “In addition, dose-proportionate downregulation of Notch-targeted genes has been seen, and this supports the clinical [pharmacodynamic] effect of crenigacestat.”

“In addition, further work is needed to study the effect of the combination of crenigacestat and dexamethasone on stem cell renewal and minimum residual disease eradication,” added the authors. “However, this conclusion is outside the scope of this study.”

Reference:

Borthakur G, Martinelli G, Raffoux E, et al. Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Crenigacestat (LY3039478) in Combination With Dexamethasone in Patients With T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33188

Recent Videos
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.
The medical characteristics of a patient may heavily factor into the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibition for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
The toxicity profile of interferon and the limited availability of transplantation established a need for TKI development for chronic myeloid leukemia.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
Related Content
Advertisement

An indirect comparison supports continuous therapy with zanubrutinib as a valuable treatment option in treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.

Indirect Comparison Favors Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax Combo in CLL/SLL

Russ Conroy
September 26th 2025
Article

An indirect comparison supports continuous therapy with zanubrutinib as a valuable treatment option in treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.


Managing Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients on CAR T-Cell Therapy

Managing Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients on CAR T-Cell Therapy

Elizabeth Shpall, MD
May 29th 2019
Podcast

Ahead of the ASCO Annual Meeting, we discuss the assessment and management of cytokine release syndrome in patients with cancer with Elizabeth Shpall, MD.


Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Ziftomenib yielded a median overall survival of 16.4 months in responders with NPM1-mutant AML who received ziftomenib in the phase 1b/2 KOMET-001 trial.


Immunotherapy Approaches in AML

Immunotherapy Approaches in AML

Naval Daver, MD
January 17th 2019
Podcast

Cancer Network sat down with Dr. Naval Daver to discuss advancements and discoveries in immunotherapy for AML patients.


Chronic myeloid leukemia was once known as a deadly disease, renowned for its difficulty to treat.

Recapping A Quarter Decade of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

Tim Cortese
September 2nd 2025
Article

Jorge Cortes, MD, believes that, despite the rapid improvements made in CML treatment, there is always more to be done to help patients.


The AML Epigenomic Risk model used 946 AML-only peripheral blood or bone marrow samples at diagnosis.

AI Prognostic Tool Confirms Concordance Through Epigenomic Signatures in AML

Tim Cortese
August 26th 2025
Article

Both experimental models significantly improved upon historical clinical risk trial groups for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Related Content
Advertisement

An indirect comparison supports continuous therapy with zanubrutinib as a valuable treatment option in treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.

Indirect Comparison Favors Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax Combo in CLL/SLL

Russ Conroy
September 26th 2025
Article

An indirect comparison supports continuous therapy with zanubrutinib as a valuable treatment option in treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.


Managing Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients on CAR T-Cell Therapy

Managing Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients on CAR T-Cell Therapy

Elizabeth Shpall, MD
May 29th 2019
Podcast

Ahead of the ASCO Annual Meeting, we discuss the assessment and management of cytokine release syndrome in patients with cancer with Elizabeth Shpall, MD.


Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

Tim Cortese
September 11th 2025
Article

Ziftomenib yielded a median overall survival of 16.4 months in responders with NPM1-mutant AML who received ziftomenib in the phase 1b/2 KOMET-001 trial.


Immunotherapy Approaches in AML

Immunotherapy Approaches in AML

Naval Daver, MD
January 17th 2019
Podcast

Cancer Network sat down with Dr. Naval Daver to discuss advancements and discoveries in immunotherapy for AML patients.


Chronic myeloid leukemia was once known as a deadly disease, renowned for its difficulty to treat.

Recapping A Quarter Decade of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

Tim Cortese
September 2nd 2025
Article

Jorge Cortes, MD, believes that, despite the rapid improvements made in CML treatment, there is always more to be done to help patients.


The AML Epigenomic Risk model used 946 AML-only peripheral blood or bone marrow samples at diagnosis.

AI Prognostic Tool Confirms Concordance Through Epigenomic Signatures in AML

Tim Cortese
August 26th 2025
Article

Both experimental models significantly improved upon historical clinical risk trial groups for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.