A crisis in metastatic breast ca development

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 9
Volume 18
Issue 9

In about 30% of U.S. women who receive a diagnosis of early breast cancer, the cancer will progress to metastatic disease, but in the developing world, most cancer is initially diagnosed at an advanced stage, said William Gradishar, MD, director of medical breast oncology at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, at Northwestern University, Chicago.

In about 30% of U.S. women who receive a diagnosis of early breast cancer, the cancer will progress to metastatic disease, but in the developing world, most cancer is initially diagnosed at an advanced stage, said William Gradishar, MD, director of medical breast oncology at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Unfortunately, the increasing number of MBC trials has not been accompanied by a comparable increase in enrollment. For the 80% of trials that become delayed, poor enrollment is the chief cause. This has created a “crisis in drug development,” Dr. Gradishar said. “Unless we involve patients in trials, we are not likely to make expedient progress with new therapies.”

According to BRIDGE results, 26% of the respondents had searched for information on clinical trials, 23% had been invited to participate, and 18% had actually enrolled. The principal reason for not enrolling was lack of invitation or recommendation by a healthcare professional.

Physician influence was the primary factor driving participation, no matter the country, reported Dr. Fallowfield during an AACR 2009 press briefing. Trial participation rates ranged from a high of 35% in Mexico to a low rate of 7% in France. When women were invited to participate in a trial, two-thirds accepted. For the one-third who declined, fear of side effects, ineligibility, and perceived lack of personal benefit were given as primary reasons.

Recent Videos
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content