Dan Pollyea, MD, MS, on the Discovery and Incidence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in Patients With AML

Video

IDH1/2 mutations have been detected in nearly 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

A study of venetoclax (Venclexta) plus azacitidine (Vidaza) resulted in higher response rates, longer duration of response, and a higher median overall survival versus azacitidine alone for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring IDH1/2 mutations who were treatment naïve and ineligible for chemotherapy.

The results of the study, which pooled data from an ongoing phase 3 study (NCT02993523) and a phase 1b study (NCT02203773), were presented at the 2020 American Society for Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition, and provided further evidence of an effective treatment for this patient cohort, many of whom are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy due to existing comorbidities or age.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Dan Pollyea, MD, MS, of the University of Colorado Cancer Center, discussed how these mutations were originally discovered.

Transcript:

We have only known about the presence of IDH in AML for about the last 10 years. It’s really a fascinating story. A little over 10 years ago, the first patient with cancer had whole genome sequencing performed. That patient happened to [have AML], and that patient happened to have an IDH1 mutation. That was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. We’ve since gone back and looked and done targeted resequencing to see what the incidence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are in AML; it’s upwards of 20% of patients who have these mutations, which we didn’t even know about them before. It’s really fascinating story. Add to that the fact that these are targetable mutations on their own and that there are 2 therapies that are specifically FDA approved for use in the relapse setting for patients with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. There’s just been a lot of excitement around this in general.

Reference:

Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, et al. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1058-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903840

Recent Videos
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Related Content