Data Available From Cetuximab Study in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 21 No 6
Volume 21
Issue 6

ImClone and Bristol-Myers Squibb announced that a phase III study of cetuximab (Erbitux) plus gemcitabine (Gemzar) in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer did not meet its primary endpoint of improving overall survival.

ImClone and Bristol-Myers Squibb announced that a phase III study of cetuximab (Erbitux) plus gemcitabine (Gemzar) in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer did not meet its primary endpoint of improving overall survival.

Conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), the open-label, randomized study compared cetuximab plus gemcitabine to gemcitabine alone in more than 700 patients with pancreatic cancer in the first-line treatment setting. The study was conducted in centers throughout the United States and Canada. It was completed in a significantly shorter time than projected, providing a timely answer to an important research question. SWOG has informed ImClone and Bristol-Myers Squibb that the primary study endpoint of statistically improving overall survival was not met. The three parties—SWOG, ImClone, and Bristol-Myers Squibb—will engage in joint efforts to fully interpret these results.

"This study was designed to examine the phase II results we previously observed for Eribtux in patients with pancreatic cancer," stated Eric K. Rowinsky, MD, chief medical officer and senior vice president of ImClone. "We still consider pancreatic cancer to be of the utmost priority and we intend to pursue additional evaluations with Erbitux including a pilot study of Erbitux and bevacizumab with or without gemcitabine, as well as our pipeline agents, to improve the outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer."

Recent Videos
Skin toxicities are common with targeted therapies for GI malignancies but can be remedied by preventative measures and a collaboration with dermatology.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Related Content