Efficacy Makes Sacituzumab Govitecan ‘Attractive’ in Advanced Breast Cancer

Video

An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute highlights data that supported the FDA’s approval of sacituzumab govitecan for advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Data from the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial (NCT03901339) indicated that sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) yielded various improvements in efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, chief of the Division of Breast Oncology and associate director of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancer at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, in Boston, ahead of the FDA’s approval of sacituzumab govitecan about data supporting the agency’s action.1

In the TROPiCS-02 trial, there was a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.0) in the sacituzumab arm compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.1-4.4) in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.646-0.964; P = .02).2 Additionally, the median overall survival (OS) was 14.4 months vs 11.2 months in each respective cohort (HR, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.646-0.964; P = .02).3

Tolaney noted the value of the improvements made in efficacy among patients treated with sacituzumab. “[The data] makes [sacituzumab] a really attractive agent for this patient population,” she said.

Transcript:

TROPiCS-02 had really explored sacituzumab govitecan in patients who were very heavily pretreated. They had had a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor, they had had a minimum of 2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced disease setting, and could have received up to 4 lines of chemotherapy, so they had a median of 3 [lines of chemotherapy previously received]. [Patients were] very heavily pretreated, and patients had been randomized to get sacituzumab or to get treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy. What we saw was that sacituzumab not only improved progression-free survival but, in fact, led to statistically significant improvement in overall survival, as well as significant improvement in objective response rate. What we're seeing is that this agent does perform better than chemotherapy in this population all around in terms of response, PFS, and OS. And so I think it makes it a really attractive agent for this patient population.

References

  1. U.S FDA approves Trodelvy in pre-treated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. News release. Gilead. February 3, 2023. Accessed February 3, 2023. https://bwnews.pr/3Y0bftX
  2. Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marme F, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(29):3365-3376. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01002
  3. Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marme F, et al. Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III TROPiCS-02 study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 7):S808-S869. doi:10.1016/annonc/annonc1089
Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Patients who face smoking stigma, perceive a lack of insurance, or have other low-dose CT related concerns may benefit from blood testing for lung cancer.
Establishment of an AYA Lymphoma Consortium has facilitated a process to better understand and address gaps in knowledge for this patient group.
Adult and pediatric oncology collaboration in assessing nivolumab in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma facilitated the phase 3 SWOG S1826 findings.
Treatment paradigms differ between adult and pediatric oncologists when treating young adults with lymphoma.
Differences in pancreatic cancer responses to treatment elicits a need to better educate patients on expectations in treatment, particularly chemotherapy.
Increasing patient awareness of modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer may help mitigate incidence of pancreatic cancers.
It may be crucial to test every patient for markers such as BRAF V600E mutations, NRG1 fusions, and KRAS G12C mutations to help manage pancreatic cancers.
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, MD, emphasizes the idea of moving targeted therapies to earlier lines of treatment to further improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer.
The Together for Supportive Cancer Care coalition may advance the national conversation in ensuring comprehensive care for all patients with cancer.