Efficacy Makes Sacituzumab Govitecan ‘Attractive’ in Advanced Breast Cancer

Video

An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute highlights data that supported the FDA’s approval of sacituzumab govitecan for advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Data from the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial (NCT03901339) indicated that sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) yielded various improvements in efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, chief of the Division of Breast Oncology and associate director of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancer at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, in Boston, ahead of the FDA’s approval of sacituzumab govitecan about data supporting the agency’s action.1

In the TROPiCS-02 trial, there was a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.0) in the sacituzumab arm compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.1-4.4) in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.646-0.964; P = .02).2 Additionally, the median overall survival (OS) was 14.4 months vs 11.2 months in each respective cohort (HR, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.646-0.964; P = .02).3

Tolaney noted the value of the improvements made in efficacy among patients treated with sacituzumab. “[The data] makes [sacituzumab] a really attractive agent for this patient population,” she said.

Transcript:

TROPiCS-02 had really explored sacituzumab govitecan in patients who were very heavily pretreated. They had had a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor, they had had a minimum of 2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced disease setting, and could have received up to 4 lines of chemotherapy, so they had a median of 3 [lines of chemotherapy previously received]. [Patients were] very heavily pretreated, and patients had been randomized to get sacituzumab or to get treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy. What we saw was that sacituzumab not only improved progression-free survival but, in fact, led to statistically significant improvement in overall survival, as well as significant improvement in objective response rate. What we're seeing is that this agent does perform better than chemotherapy in this population all around in terms of response, PFS, and OS. And so I think it makes it a really attractive agent for this patient population.

References

  1. U.S FDA approves Trodelvy in pre-treated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. News release. Gilead. February 3, 2023. Accessed February 3, 2023. https://bwnews.pr/3Y0bftX
  2. Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marme F, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(29):3365-3376. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01002
  3. Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marme F, et al. Overall survival (OS) results from the phase III TROPiCS-02 study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 7):S808-S869. doi:10.1016/annonc/annonc1089
Recent Videos
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Related Content