Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, on Depth of Response in from the KEYNOTE-426 Trial

Video

Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, discussed the depth of response for patients included in the KEYNOTE-426 trial investigating axitinib and pembrolizumab over sunitinib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Elizabeth Plimack, MD, MS, of the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, discussed the depth of response for patients when investigating axitinib (Inlyta) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) over sunitinib (Sutent) in the updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426 presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program.

Transcription:

An exploratory analysis that we performed was looking at patients who survived to 6 months and assessing what their documented response was during that 6-month period. We didn’t just look at resist response, we looked at depth of response, so the percent shrinkage of target lesions. We put them into categories based on their depth of response. What we saw is that in a plus p, the deeper the response, the more the percentage of shrinkage in the target lesions, the better the overall survival. This relationship was pretty consistent across all the categories we looked at. This relationship did not interestingly hold true in the sunitinib arm, where depth of response did not seem to be as predictive of long-term outcome. In summary, we’re very pleased to report updated analysis of KEYNOTE-426. Since overall survival long-term is what we’re looking to achieve in this group of patients, we hope to continue to provide updates annually, certainly out to 5 years. I’m really interested in the 10-year update of this, sort of looking out into the future. Hopefully, we will show that some patients maintain durable responses in even treatment-free survival after treatment with axi pembro in the front-line.

Recent Videos
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Improving data collection and biomarker development across institutions may represent areas of expansion in kidney cancer research.
KIM-1 is a biomarker in the blood that may help noninvasively detect kidney cancer, according to Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD.
A phase 0 trial is seeking to assess the feasibility of aiding anti-cancer cells with cytokines to restore their function.
Related Content