Evaluating the Use of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in Academic and Community Settings

Publication
Article
ONCOLOGY® CompanionONCOLOGY® Companion, Volume 38, Supplement 8
Volume 38
Issue 8
Pages: 8

Strategies for treating patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible to receive CAR T-cell therapy in either community or academic practices were discussed in a recent Training Academy.

Meet the experts.

Meet the experts.

In a recent Training Academy program hosted by CancerNetwork®, a panel of experts in multiple myeloma highlighted treatment strategies for patients who are eligible to receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and described critical processes associated with patients transitioning between community practices and academic centers. The panel discussed topics ranging from optimally timing leukapheresis to monitoring patients for neurotoxicity throughout the treatment course. Here are their key takeaways:

Determining Suitable Conditions for CAR T-Cell Therapy

  • The role of the immune system in anticancer therapy has become more widely acknowledged, making conversations with patients about eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy easier.
    • CAR T-cell therapy may not be as effective in those with high-risk genetics; age may also influence efficacy.
  • Community oncologists may share treatment decision-making with their colleagues in academic centers.
    • Some patients may prefer to receive close monitoring in a community setting while undergoing bridging therapy.
    • Transportation issues may also make treatment in a community setting more suitable.
    • Deferring to academic colleagues may be suitable in the case of aggressive early-line disease.

Administering CAR T Cells at Academic Centers

  • Triaging patients for potential CAR T-cell therapy at academic centers is dependent on the extent of their disease relapse.
    • Patients with standard-risk disease may receive several triplet therapy options.
    • Patients with functionally high-risk disease and quick relapses may be prioritized for CAR T-cell therapy.
  • Patients who receive CAR T-cell therapy may be able to return to community centers soon following the window for cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome.
    • Patients may return as soon as 4 weeks following infusion if their counts have adequately recovered.
    • Count recovery following CAR T-cell therapy, however, may take as long as 3 months.

Monitoring Neurotoxicity and Ensuring Treatment Access

  • It may be necessary to develop a systematic approach to monitor for potential neurotoxicity such as parkinsonism.
    • Academic oncologists can educate their community colleagues about these adverse effects.
    • Patients should also be educated on potential signs of toxicity.
  • Ensuring that patients can access CAR T-cell therapy is an ongoing challenge.
    • Academic practices may offer housing options on campus for patients.
    • Having conversations with insurance providers may also financially assist with having patients in proximity to a treatment center.
Recent Videos
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Current FDA expectations may allow patients to return to their community physicians at 2 weeks after administration of anitocabtagene autoleucel.
Based on its mechanism of action, anito-cel may cause fewer instances of cytokine release syndrome and delayed toxicities vs other therapies.
Combining daratumumab with other agents is one strategy that investigators are exploring in the smoldering multiple myeloma field.
A substantial portion of patients who received daratumumab in the AQUILA study were able to delay disease progression to active multiple myeloma.
The approval of daratumumab validates the notion of using limited therapy to help delay progression from smoldering disease to multiple myeloma.
Related Content