Expert Looks Forward to Potentially Practice-Changing Presentations at ASCO 2021

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Alison Schram, MD, to discuss her thoughts on research with the greatest potential to positively influence patient care being presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting.

In preparation for the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Alison Schram, MD, an assistant attending physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, to discuss which abstracts she is excited to see presented at the meeting.

She highlighted impending results from the phase 3 RELATIVITY-047 trial (NCT03470922) of frontline relatlimab plus nivolumab (Opdivo) versus nivolumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma.1 She also looks forward to data from a late breaking abstract featuring results of the phase 3 OUTBACK trial (NCT01414608) examining adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.2

Transcript:

The phase 3 RELATIVITY[-047] study, a trial in melanoma, is particularly exciting. As a [gynecologic] medical oncologist, I am interested in the cervical cancer study looking at OUTBACK chemotherapy, which I do think is practice changing. Many of us already do this and really are awaiting these results.

References

1. Lipson EJ, Tawabi HA, Schadendorf D, et al. Relatlimab (RELA) plus nivolumab (NIVO) versus NIVO in first-line advanced melanoma: Primary phase III results from RELATIVITY-047 (CA224-047). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):9503. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9503

2. Mileshkin LR, Moore KN, Barnes E, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone: The randomized phase III OUTBACK Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):LBA3. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.LBA3

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content