FDA Allows Marketing of Tissue Containment System for Use in Power Morcellation

Article

While continuing to warn against use of laparoscopic power morcellators for the removal of uterus or uterine fibroids in most women, the FDA is allowing the marketing of a containment system for use with certain power morcellators to isolate tissue not suspected to be cancerous.

The agency continues to warn against use of power morcellators for the removal of uterus or uterine fibroids in most women

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing the marketing of PneumoLiner, a containment system for use with certain laparoscopic power morcellators to isolate uterine tissue not suspected to be cancerous.

“The PneumoLiner is intended to contain morcellated tissue in the very limited patient population for whom power morcellation may be an appropriate therapeutic option-and only if patients have been appropriately informed of the risks,” said William Maisel, MD, MPH, deputy director for science and chief scientist at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health in a statement, in a press release.

Use of laparoscopic power morcellators may inadvertently spread undetected cancer cells. The FDA estimates that about 1 in 350 women who undergo a hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids is found to have an unsuspected uterine sarcoma.

“This new device does not change our position on the risks associated with power morcellation. We are continuing to warn against the use of power morcellators for the vast majority of women undergoing removal of the uterus or uterine fibroids,” said Maisel.

PneumoLiner is a containment bag and tube-like plunger that delivers the device into the abdominal cavity. The tissue is placed in the bag and the bag is inflated, providing an isolated space for the tissue and visualization during the tissue break up process. The device was tested in the laboratory to simulate intended use as well as worst-case scenario conditions, according to the FDA. Testing of the device found the bag to be impermeable to other tissues, cells, and body fluids and provided enough space for the surgeon to perform the morcellation.

According to the FDA, the PneumoLiner device is only permitted when the uterine tissue is not suspected to harbor cancer. The FDA is also requiring the device’s manufacturer to warn clinicians and patients that the device has not been proven to reduce the risk of spreading cancer during these procedures.

The device is indicated for a limited patient population of women without uterine fibroids who are undergoing a hysterectomy and certain premenopausal women with fibroids who want to maintain their fertility. For these women, the laparoscopic power morcellation procedure is an appropriate option compared to invasive surgery, noted the agency.

Potential risks associated with use of PneumoLiner include dissemination of the broken up tissue, injury to surrounding tissues or organs, infections, and a prolongation of the surgical procedure.

Recent Videos
Ritu Salani, MD, discussed investigational endometrial cancer treatment options for patients with varying subtypes of endometrial cancer.
The second interim analysis of the phase 3 RUBY trial found the safety profile was consistent with the first interim analysis and no new deaths due to AEs were observed.
The phase 3 RUBY trial evaluated dostarlimab in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
Accelerated approval of afami-cel may expand access to therapy for patients who are unable to live near certain treatment centers.
Treatment with afami-cel may offer improved quality of life to patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma compared with continuous chemotherapy.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy appears to yield favorable overall survival in patients with mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer.
Pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in response rates in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer.
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Related Content