FDA Grants Regular Approval to Venetoclax Combo for Older Adults with AML

News
Article

The FDA granted regular approval to venetoclax (Venclexta) in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine for adults 75 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, or who those have comorbidities precluding intensive induction chemotherapy.

The FDA has granted regular approval to venetoclax (Venclexta) in combination with azacitidine (Vidaza), decitabine, or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) for adults 75 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or who those have comorbidities precluding intensive induction chemotherapy.

Initially, the FDA granted accelerated approval to venetoclax for this indication in November 2018. Therefore, the efficacy of venetoclax was confirmed in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in the aforementioned patient population.

In the VIALE-A study (NCT02993523), patients were randomized to receive either venetoclax plus azacitidine (n = 286) or placebo plus azacitidine (n = 145). Efficacy was established based on improved overall survival (OS).

Median OS was 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.9-18.7) in patients treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine compared to 9.6 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.7) in those receiving placebo plus azacytidine, reducing the risk for death by 34% (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P < .001). Those treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine also demonstrated an improvement in complete remission (CR) rate, with 37% (95% CI, 31%-43%) experiencing a CR versus 18% (95% CI, 12%-25%) in the placebo arm.

Moreover, in the VIALE-C study (NCT03069352), patients were randomized to receive either venetoclax plus LDAC (n = 143) or placebo plus LDAC (n = 68). Efficacy was based on CR rate and duration of CR.

The CR rate in the venetoclax plus LDAC arm was 27% (95% CI, 20%-35%), compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached) in those receiving placebo plus LDAC. Median durations of CR were 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-not reached) and 7.4% (95% CI, 2.4%-16%), respectively. Of note, however, the addition of venetoclax did not significantly improve OS versus placebo plus LDAC (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.07; P = .114).

The most common adverse events observed with venetoclax were nausea, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, constipation, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, vomiting, edema, pyrexia, pneumonia, dyspnea, hemorrhage, anemia, rash, abdominal pain, sepsis, musculoskeletal pain, dizziness, cough, oropharyngeal pain, and hypotension.

This review was conducted under Project Orbis, where the FDA collaborated with the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, Health Canada, and Switzerland’s Swissmedic.

Further, using the real-time oncology review (RTOR) pilot program, and the assessment aid, the application for the venetoclax combination was approved 5 weeks ahead of the FDA PDUFA date.

Reference:

FDA grants regular approval to venetoclax in combination for untreated acute myeloid leukemia [news release]. FDA. Published October 16, 2020. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-grants-regular-approval-venetoclax-combination-untreated-acute-myeloid-leukemia

Recent Videos
Daniel Peters, MD, aims to reduce the toxicity associated with AML treatments while also improving therapeutic outcomes.
Patients with AML will experience different toxicities based on the treatment they receive, whether it is intensive chemotherapy or targeted therapy.
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Yale’s COPPER Center aims to address disparities and out-of-pocket costs for patients, thereby improving the delivery of complex cancer treatment.
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other indolent forms of disease may require sequencing new treatments for years or decades, said Scott Huntington, MD, MPH, MSc.
Fixed-duration therapy may be more suitable for younger patients, while continuous therapy may benefit those who are older with more comorbidities.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
A 2-way communication between providers and patients may help facilitate dose modifications to help better manage adverse effects.
Treatment with AML depends on a variety of factors, including stage of treatment, transplant eligibility, and mutational status.
Related Content